HELG
HELG Collision Engine
Week of May 16, 2026
Weekly run. 8 priority companies. Each card has three outreach tabs — LinkedIn DM, Email Draft, LinkedIn Post. Click Contacts to expand the list. Past Monday runs are at the bottom.
Scanned
62
Prioritized
8
High signal (8+)
6
Contacts
92
Cold
47
Warm
9
Client
29

Priority Outreach — sorted by signal score

Devon Energy ·  5 Cold · 12 Client · 2 Unknown  ·  Permian  ·  19 contacts
10/10
Devon–Coterra merger closed May 7, 2026Devon Energy press release · May 7, 2026
Reason to reach out
Devon and Coterra closed their all-stock merger on May 7 — nine days ago. The combined Delaware Basin position is the largest pure-play in the basin. JOA re-execution, curative-on-acquired leasehold, and NMOCD compulsory pooling coordination across the now-unified NM footprint start immediately and don't slow-roll. Twelve contacts on the list are already at Client stage, most carrying @coterra.com addresses — they are navigating this integration now. (Source: Devon Energy press release, May 7, 2026)
Primary contact: Scott Richter
LinkedIn DM — send to Scott Richter
Scott — the Devon-Coterra close on May 7 puts a real volume of title and JOA work in motion at once. The combined Delaware Basin positions carry legacy acreage from both companies, and the pooling and curative coordination across that footprint is where the work tends to stack up fastest in the first 90 days. We handle that workflow in the Permian and New Mexico regularly. If any of it is landing on your desk during the integration, worth a quick call. — Ben Holliday, HELG · 210.469.3187
Email subject
Devon-Coterra close — title and JOA work that follows immediately
Email body (swap [First Name] when sending)
Hi [First Name], The Devon-Coterra merger closed May 7. Nine days in, the combined Delaware Basin position is the largest pure-play in the basin, and the immediate title and JOA workflow that follows a close of that scale tends to be where the first 90 days get consumed. Three patterns we see consistently on integrations like this: JOA re-execution across combined operated positions where both companies had different form agreements, curative-on-acquired leasehold that the prior operator hadn't run to ground, and NMOCD compulsory pooling coordination across the now-unified NM footprint where pooling applications straddle legacy Coterra and Devon positions. We handle all three workflows in the Permian and New Mexico. Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law, licensed in Texas and New Mexico, sole focus on energy. If a quick call to compare notes on what's building in your queue would be useful, I'm easy to reach. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
Subject + body combined
Subject: Devon-Coterra close — title and JOA work that follows immediately Hi [First Name], The Devon-Coterra merger closed May 7. Nine days in, the combined Delaware Basin position is the largest pure-play in the basin, and the immediate title and JOA workflow that follows a close of that scale tends to be where the first 90 days get consumed. Three patterns we see consistently on integrations like this: JOA re-execution across combined operated positions where both companies had different form agreements, curative-on-acquired leasehold that the prior operator hadn't run to ground, and NMOCD compulsory pooling coordination across the now-unified NM footprint where pooling applications straddle legacy Coterra and Devon positions. We handle all three workflows in the Permian and New Mexico. Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law, licensed in Texas and New Mexico, sole focus on energy. If a quick call to compare notes on what's building in your queue would be useful, I'm easy to reach. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
LinkedIn post (broader pattern — no operator name)
When two major Delaware Basin operators merge, the JOA re-execution and curative-on-acquired-position work starts on day one — not when the integration timeline says it should. The land team inheriting the combined acreage faces a title workflow that can't be slow-rolled. The compulsory pooling coordination across a unified NM footprint is typically the piece that moves slowest if it starts late. Worth getting that workflow stood up before the synergy clock starts.
Contacts (19) ·  click to show the list  ·  emails pulled from clients-list.xlsx
NameEmailStage
Matt BeaversNo email address foundCold
Andy BennettNo email address foundUnknown
Keaton CurtisKeaton.Curtis@coterra.comClient
Kevin Gavigankevin.p.gavigan@gmail.com, Kevin.Gavigan@coterra.comCold
Michael HolidayMichael.Holiday@coterra.comClient
Martin HowellNo email address foundCold
Adam MorganAdam.Morgan@coterra.comClient
Blair NutterNo email address foundClient
Dylan Parkdylan.park@coterra.comClient
Colt ParksNo email address foundCold
Megan PowellNo email address foundClient
Scott RichterScott.Richter@coterra.comClient
Trey RobersonTrey.Roberson@coterra.comClient
Ashley St.PierreAshley.StPierre@coterra.comClient
Tristan WalkerTristan.Walker@coterra.comClient
Tristan WalkerNo email address foundCold
Brad WechslerBrad.Wechsler@coterra.comClient
Russell WickmanRussell.Wickman@coterra.comClient
Aaron YoungNo email address foundUnknown
Diamondback Energy ·  19 Cold · 5 Warm · 1 Unknown  ·  Permian  ·  25 contacts
10/10
Barnett full-scale launch H2 2026 + midstream build-outDiamondback Q1 2026 investor presentation · May 2026 + Energy Transfer Ector County filing
Reason to reach out
Diamondback announced full-scale Barnett development launching H2 2026. Thirty delineation wells this year, ramp to ~100 gross/year in 2027. The fastest Barnett well in company history came in at ~18 days and sub-$400/lateral foot. Energy Transfer is registering the Paloma Compressor Station in Ector County — midstream infrastructure ahead of the ramp. Stacked Barnett/Wolfcamp development across 200,000 net Midland acres creates depth-severance and retained-acreage title work that is not trivial at that pace. (Source: Diamondback Q1 2026 investor presentation, May 2026)
Primary contact: Matt Midkiff
LinkedIn DM — send to Matt Midkiff
Matt — the Barnett full-scale launch in H2 is a program that creates a different kind of title question than Spraberry/Wolfcamp. Depth-severance language in legacy Midland Basin deeds wasn't written for stacked Barnett development at pace. We work that pattern. If any of the title or regulatory questions from the ramp-up are landing on your desk, worth a quick conversation. — Ben Holliday, HELG · 210.469.3187
Email subject
Barnett H2 launch — depth-severance and retained-acreage questions worth getting ahead of
Email body (swap [First Name] when sending)
Hi [First Name], Diamondback's investor presentation this month confirmed full-scale Barnett development launching in H2 2026 — 30 delineation wells this year, target roughly 100 gross wells per year beginning in 2027. The Paloma Compressor Station filing by Energy Transfer in Ector County signals midstream is getting ahead of the ramp. The title work on stacked Barnett/Wolfcamp development across legacy Midland Basin positions surfaces a specific set of questions. Depth-severance language in pre-1970s deeds across that acreage was not written for multi-formation horizontal development. The retained-acreage analysis across 200,000 net acres where both Wolfcamp and Barnett are being developed simultaneously is non-trivial at that pace. We work Midland Basin title regularly. Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law, licensed in Texas and New Mexico. If getting ahead of those questions makes sense, I'd welcome 15 minutes to compare notes. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
Subject + body combined
Subject: Barnett H2 launch — depth-severance and retained-acreage questions worth getting ahead of Hi [First Name], Diamondback's investor presentation this month confirmed full-scale Barnett development launching in H2 2026 — 30 delineation wells this year, target roughly 100 gross wells per year beginning in 2027. The Paloma Compressor Station filing by Energy Transfer in Ector County signals midstream is getting ahead of the ramp. The title work on stacked Barnett/Wolfcamp development across legacy Midland Basin positions surfaces a specific set of questions. Depth-severance language in pre-1970s deeds across that acreage was not written for multi-formation horizontal development. The retained-acreage analysis across 200,000 net acres where both Wolfcamp and Barnett are being developed simultaneously is non-trivial at that pace. We work Midland Basin title regularly. Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law, licensed in Texas and New Mexico. If getting ahead of those questions makes sense, I'd welcome 15 minutes to compare notes. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
LinkedIn post (broader pattern — no operator name)
Stacked-pay development across 200,000 acres in the Midland Basin Barnett is a different title workflow than what most Permian operators have run before. The depth-severance language in legacy Midland deeds was written for vertical development in the 1950s and 1960s. It wasn't written for 18-day laterals targeting a formation 2,000 feet below the Wolfcamp. Worth the title pass before the bit is running at pace.
Contacts (25) ·  click to show the list  ·  emails pulled from clients-list.xlsx
NameEmailStage
Danielle Andersonldanderson@diamondbackenergy.comCold
Laura Barnettlbarnett@diamondbackenergy.comCold
Jaydan BirdJbird@diamondbackenergy.comCold
Greg Boggsgboggs@diamondbackenergy.comCold
Randis ButtsNo email address foundCold
Bill CarawayNo email address foundUnknown
Kevin Dickersonkdickerson@diamondbackenergy.comCold
Neil DuffordNo email address foundCold
Chas Gauthiercgauth@gmail.comWarm
Jennifer Georgejgeorge@diamondbackenergy.comCold
Mandy Hendrixmhendrix@diamondbackenergy.comCold
Jason Hensonjhenson@diamondbackenergy.comCold
Tyler HumphriesNo email address foundCold
Joseph Jarkejjarke@diamondbackenergy.comWarm
Ryan KellyNo email address foundCold
Matt Midkiffmmidkiff@diamondbackenergy.comWarm
Matthew MidkiffNo email address foundCold
Katayoun Mohebkhosravikmoheb@diamondbackenergy.comCold
Drew Neagledneagle@diamondbackenergy.comCold
Michael OwenNo email address foundCold
Kyle Piercekpierce@diamondbackenergy.comCold
Aaron Tanneratanner@diamondbackenergy.comCold
Chase Van Winklecvanwinkle@diamondbackenergy.comWarm
Andrew Wallerawaller@diamondbackenergy.comWarm
Amanda Winklerawinkler@diamondbackenergy.comCold
BPX Energy ·  6 Cold · 2 Unknown  ·  Eagle Ford  ·  8 contacts
9/10
Eagle Ford refrac program delivering triple-digit returnsBP Q1 2026 earnings call + BPX operations data · April–May 2026
Reason to reach out
BP's Q1 2026 call confirmed BPX is a strategic portfolio pillar — 8% U.S. shale growth targeted in 2026, Eagle Ford refrac program delivering triple-digit returns. The refrac program on existing Eagle Ford wellbores raises a distinct set of title questions around wellbore conveyance, depth severance, and whether the original lease language covers restimulation zones. All eight contacts currently Cold — pure new-logo opportunity. (Source: BP Q1 2026 earnings call, late April 2026)
Primary contact: Aaron Bloedow
LinkedIn DM — send to Aaron Bloedow
Aaron — BP's Q1 call put BPX's Eagle Ford refrac program front and center. Triple-digit returns on refracs is a compelling number. The title and wellbore-conveyance questions that come with a refrac program on existing wellbores are different from new-drill work — depth severance, restimulation clause language, and what the original lease actually covers. We work that pattern. If any of it is showing up on your desk, worth a quick conversation. — Ben Holliday, HELG · 210.469.3187
Email subject
BPX Eagle Ford refracs — wellbore-conveyance and lease questions worth a look
Email body (swap [First Name] when sending)
Hi [First Name], BP's Q1 call called out BPX's Eagle Ford refrac program as a real portfolio contributor — triple-digit-plus returns. That program is a different title and legal workflow than new-drill work, and it tends to surface specific questions that don't come up on a standard completion. The original Eagle Ford leases from the 2009–2014 boom weren't written with large-scale restimulation programs in mind. The depth-severance language, wellbore-conveyance provisions, and what the lease actually covers when you're restimulating an existing lateral rather than drilling a new one are questions that matter at program scale. We handle Eagle Ford title work in Karnes, DeWitt, and the Reeves County crossover regularly. Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law, licensed in Texas and New Mexico. If a 15-minute read on those questions would be useful as the program scales, I'm easy to reach. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
Subject + body combined
Subject: BPX Eagle Ford refracs — wellbore-conveyance and lease questions worth a look Hi [First Name], BP's Q1 call called out BPX's Eagle Ford refrac program as a real portfolio contributor — triple-digit-plus returns. That program is a different title and legal workflow than new-drill work, and it tends to surface specific questions that don't come up on a standard completion. The original Eagle Ford leases from the 2009–2014 boom weren't written with large-scale restimulation programs in mind. The depth-severance language, wellbore-conveyance provisions, and what the lease actually covers when you're restimulating an existing lateral rather than drilling a new one are questions that matter at program scale. We handle Eagle Ford title work in Karnes, DeWitt, and the Reeves County crossover regularly. Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law, licensed in Texas and New Mexico. If a 15-minute read on those questions would be useful as the program scales, I'm easy to reach. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
LinkedIn post (broader pattern — no operator name)
Eagle Ford refracs at triple-digit returns are a compelling program. The title work is different than new drills. The original Eagle Ford leases from 2009 to 2014 weren't written with restimulation programs in mind — depth severance language, wellbore conveyance clauses, and what 'production in paying quantities' means on a refrac'd lateral are the questions that surface fastest. Worth the legal read before the program scales.
Contacts (8) ·  click to show the list  ·  emails pulled from clients-list.xlsx
NameEmailStage
Aaron BloedowNo email address foundCold
Josh CainNo email address foundUnknown
Stephanie GannawayNo email address foundCold
Chris KirganNo email address foundCold
John KrattenmakerNo email address foundCold
Lauren RossNo email address foundCold
Bradley StephensonNo email address foundUnknown
Kyle WynnNo email address foundCold
Permian Resources ·  1 Cold · 17 Client  ·  Permian  ·  18 contacts
9/10
Record Q1 FCF + fastest well in company historyPermian Resources Q1 2026 earnings release · May 7, 2026
Reason to reach out
Permian Resources reported record FCF and the fastest well in company history on May 7 — 2,500 feet per day, $675/lateral foot. Guidance raised to 190–195 MBbls/d. At that drilling pace across Reeves and Reagan County positions, the retained-acreage and stacked-pay title analysis tends to fall behind the bit. Seventeen of 18 contacts are already at Client stage — this is a relationship check-in against a fresh operational signal. (Source: Q1 2026 earnings release, May 7, 2026)
Primary contact: Oliver Cho
LinkedIn DM — send to Oliver Cho
Oliver — 2,500 feet per day is a serious pace. When the bit moves that fast across multi-section Reeves and Reagan positions, the retained-acreage analysis and the stacked-pay Wolfcamp title work tend to stack up behind it. Always happy to compare notes on what's building in your queue. Check in when you have a few minutes. — Ben Holliday, HELG
Email subject
2,500 feet per day — title work at that drilling pace
Email body (swap [First Name] when sending)
Hi [First Name], Permian Resources' Q1 release on May 7 flagged 2,500 feet per day as the fastest well in company history. At $675 per lateral foot and a guidance raise to 190–195 MBbls/d, the program is moving at a pace where the retained-acreage and stacked-pay title work tends to trail the bit rather than precede it. Two questions that tend to surface on Reeves and Reagan programs at that pace: retained-acreage analysis on legacy leasehold where the proration units don't map cleanly to modern multi-section development, and depth-severance language in older deeds where the Wolfcamp stacking wasn't contemplated by the original lessor. As the relationship between our teams has developed, this seemed like a natural check-in point — particularly with the guidance raise and the program tempo holding strong. Quick 15 minutes when it works? Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
Subject + body combined
Subject: 2,500 feet per day — title work at that drilling pace Hi [First Name], Permian Resources' Q1 release on May 7 flagged 2,500 feet per day as the fastest well in company history. At $675 per lateral foot and a guidance raise to 190–195 MBbls/d, the program is moving at a pace where the retained-acreage and stacked-pay title work tends to trail the bit rather than precede it. Two questions that tend to surface on Reeves and Reagan programs at that pace: retained-acreage analysis on legacy leasehold where the proration units don't map cleanly to modern multi-section development, and depth-severance language in older deeds where the Wolfcamp stacking wasn't contemplated by the original lessor. As the relationship between our teams has developed, this seemed like a natural check-in point — particularly with the guidance raise and the program tempo holding strong. Quick 15 minutes when it works? Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
LinkedIn post (broader pattern — no operator name)
Drilling at 2,500 feet per day on multi-section Delaware Basin positions is the kind of pace where the title work starts trailing the bit rather than leading it. Retained-acreage analysis on legacy Reeves and Reagan leasehold doesn't get easier the faster the program moves. The stacked-pay Wolfcamp depth-severance questions are the ones that tend to surface last and matter most. Clean title before the well, every time — even when the well only takes three days.
Contacts (18) ·  click to show the list  ·  emails pulled from clients-list.xlsx
NameEmailStage
Oliver ChoOliver.Cho@permianres.comClient
Hayden ClyceHayden.Clyce@permianres.comClient
Logan CookseyNo email address foundClient
Ryan Curryryan@vfpetroleum.comClient
Patrick GodwinNo email address foundCold
Matthew GrayMatthew.Gray@permianres.comClient
Mark Hajdikmark.hajdik@permianres.comClient
Kelsi HenriquesKelsi.Henriques@permianres.comClient
Jon-aaron Housejon-aaron.house@conocophillips.comClient
Michael Hurlbutmichael.hurlbut@permianres.comClient
Trevor Irbytrevor.irby@permianres.comClient
Sean JohnsonSean.Johnson@permianres.comClient
Matt Jordanmatt.jordan@permianres.comClient
Daniel KouryDaniel.Koury@permianres.comClient
Brian PondBrian.Pond@permainres.comClient
Adam RekerNo email address foundClient
Drew TarwaterNo email address foundClient
Alexa Wolfalexa.wolf@permianres.comClient
Crescent Energy ·  4 Cold  ·  South Texas  ·  4 contacts
8/10
Q1 2026 record production + Permian integration ahead of scheduleCrescent Energy Q1 2026 earnings release · May 5, 2026
Reason to reach out
Crescent reported record 341 MBoe/d on May 5 and $120M in synergies ahead of schedule. The Vital Energy Permian integration is accelerated, and the SilverBow Eagle Ford program is fully operational. All four contacts are currently Cold — no prior HELG relationship. The dual-basin integration at this pace creates curative-on-acquired-leasehold and multi-section title work that doesn't slow-roll. (Source: Crescent Q1 2026 earnings release, May 5, 2026)
Primary contact: David Hansen
LinkedIn DM — send to David Hansen
David — Crescent's Q1 numbers were strong. Record 341 MBoe/d and $120M in synergies ahead of schedule is a real operational result. Running the Vital Energy Permian integration and the SilverBow Eagle Ford program simultaneously is a title and JOA workflow that stacks up faster than the calendar allows. We work that pattern across both Eagle Ford and the Delaware Basin regularly. Worth a conversation if any of it is landing on your desk. — Ben Holliday, HELG · 210.469.3187
Email subject
Crescent's Q1 record and Permian integration — A&D title work at that pace
Email body (swap [First Name] when sending)
Hi [First Name], Crescent's Q1 release on May 5 — 341 MBoe/d, $120M in synergies ahead of target, Permian integration accelerated — represents a real operational step change from where the company was 18 months ago. Running both the Vital Energy Permian integration and the SilverBow Eagle Ford program simultaneously creates a title and JOA workflow that tends to compress quickly. On the Eagle Ford side, the curative-on-acquired leasehold patterns that surface under the SilverBow positions haven't all been worked through by prior operators. On the Permian side, the Vital Energy leasehold carries its own retained-acreage and multi-section title exposure. We handle A&D due diligence, title opinions, and multi-tract allocation work across both Eagle Ford and the Delaware Basin. Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law, licensed in Texas and New Mexico. If a 15-minute call to compare notes would be useful, I'm easy to reach. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
Subject + body combined
Subject: Crescent's Q1 record and Permian integration — A&D title work at that pace Hi [First Name], Crescent's Q1 release on May 5 — 341 MBoe/d, $120M in synergies ahead of target, Permian integration accelerated — represents a real operational step change from where the company was 18 months ago. Running both the Vital Energy Permian integration and the SilverBow Eagle Ford program simultaneously creates a title and JOA workflow that tends to compress quickly. On the Eagle Ford side, the curative-on-acquired leasehold patterns that surface under the SilverBow positions haven't all been worked through by prior operators. On the Permian side, the Vital Energy leasehold carries its own retained-acreage and multi-section title exposure. We handle A&D due diligence, title opinions, and multi-tract allocation work across both Eagle Ford and the Delaware Basin. Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law, licensed in Texas and New Mexico. If a 15-minute call to compare notes would be useful, I'm easy to reach. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
LinkedIn post (broader pattern — no operator name)
Record production and integration synergies ahead of schedule sound like good news — and they are. The title work on the other side of a dual-basin integration doesn't wait for the synergy count to settle. Curative-on-acquired Eagle Ford leasehold and Permian multi-section retained-acreage analysis both move on the program timeline, not the integration timeline. Worth getting ahead of both before the next AFE drops.
Contacts (4) ·  click to show the list  ·  emails pulled from clients-list.xlsx
NameEmailStage
David HansenNo email address foundCold
Glen HodgeNo email address foundCold
Robert MatusekNo email address foundCold
Zach MorganNo email address foundCold
Mewbourne Oil ·  3 Cold · 1 Warm  ·  Permian  ·  4 contacts
8/10
NMOCD May 13 special docket + new OCD filing rulesNMOCD OCD docket + EMNRD OCD hearing calendar · May 13, 2026
Reason to reach out
NMOCD ran a special docket on May 13. Mewbourne remains one of the most active compulsory pooling applicants in Eddy and Lea counties — Creedence 16/28 and Toto 7/10 Federal Com wells both active on recent dockets. New OCD rules effective October 2025 streamline pooling timelines but add pre-application filing hurdles that have become the primary cause of delay on contested matters. Josh Anderson is already at Warm stage. (Source: NMOCD OCD docket activity, May 13, 2026)
Primary contact: Josh Anderson
LinkedIn DM — send to Josh Anderson
Josh — NMOCD ran a special docket on May 13. The new OCD filing rules from October added pre-application requirements that are showing up as the primary delay driver on contested matters. Mewbourne's docket volume in Eddy and Lea is as high as I've seen it. If the new notice workflow is creating friction on any of the active applications, happy to walk through what we're seeing on similar cases. — Ben Holliday, HELG
Email subject
NMOCD May 13 docket and the new pre-application filing rules
Email body (swap [First Name] when sending)
Hi [First Name], NMOCD ran a special docket on May 13. Mewbourne's docket volume in Eddy and Lea County is among the highest of any operator we track, which makes the new OCD filing rules particularly relevant. The rules that took effect in October 2025 were designed to streamline pooling timelines. What we're seeing in practice: the pre-application filing requirements — specifically the notice workflow and the good-faith negotiation documentation — are now the primary source of delay on contested matters. The NMOCD is granting orders faster on applications where that documentation is clean, and the contested cases are where applicants are treating the pre-application step as an afterthought. Mewbourne's program in Eddy and Lea has enough active applications that tightening the pre-application workflow now is worth the time. We handle NMOCD compulsory pooling proceedings regularly and stay current on what's moving through the docket. If walking through the current notice process would be useful, I'm easy to reach. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
Subject + body combined
Subject: NMOCD May 13 docket and the new pre-application filing rules Hi [First Name], NMOCD ran a special docket on May 13. Mewbourne's docket volume in Eddy and Lea County is among the highest of any operator we track, which makes the new OCD filing rules particularly relevant. The rules that took effect in October 2025 were designed to streamline pooling timelines. What we're seeing in practice: the pre-application filing requirements — specifically the notice workflow and the good-faith negotiation documentation — are now the primary source of delay on contested matters. The NMOCD is granting orders faster on applications where that documentation is clean, and the contested cases are where applicants are treating the pre-application step as an afterthought. Mewbourne's program in Eddy and Lea has enough active applications that tightening the pre-application workflow now is worth the time. We handle NMOCD compulsory pooling proceedings regularly and stay current on what's moving through the docket. If walking through the current notice process would be useful, I'm easy to reach. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
LinkedIn post (broader pattern — no operator name)
The new NMOCD OCD rules effective October 2025 were sold as a streamlining measure. In practice, the pre-application filing requirements are now the leading cause of delay on contested compulsory pooling cases — not the hearing timeline. If you're filing regularly in Eddy or Lea County, the pre-application notice workflow is the place to tighten before your next filing, not after a contested matter slips.
Contacts (4) ·  click to show the list  ·  emails pulled from clients-list.xlsx
NameEmailStage
Josh Andersonjanderson@mewbourne.comWarm
Brad Dunnbdunn@mewbourne.comCold
Corey Mitchellcmitchell@mewbourne.comCold
Ariana Rodriguesarodrigues@mewbourne.comCold
Riley Permian ·  2 Warm · 2 Unknown  ·  OKC  ·  4 contacts
7/10
Q1 production beat + Targa NM pipeline Q3 2026Riley Permian Q1 2026 earnings release · May 9, 2026 + Targa midstream transaction
Reason to reach out
Riley's Q1 2026 release (May 9) showed production topping the high end of guidance at 35.6 MBoe/d. The Targa NM pipeline is on track for Q3 2026 commercial operations, and 20-plus wells are queued to TIL immediately after. With that many wells staged to come online at once, the curative and regulatory work ahead of the Q3 pipeline event is compressed — particularly on the New Mexico side where NMOCD pooling and spacing coordination matters. Michael Palmer is already at Warm stage. (Source: Riley Permian Q1 2026 earnings, May 9, 2026)
Primary contact: Michael Palmer
LinkedIn DM — send to Michael Palmer
Michael — Riley's Q1 production topped the high end of guidance, and the Targa pipeline is on track for Q3. Twenty-plus wells staged to TIL simultaneously is a compressed curative and regulatory timeline. If any of the New Mexico title or NMOCD coordination work ahead of that event is stacking up, happy to compare notes on what we're seeing on similar programs. — Ben Holliday, HELG
Email subject
Targa Q3 pipeline and 20-plus wells staged to TIL — regulatory timing worth flagging
Email body (swap [First Name] when sending)
Hi [First Name], Riley's Q1 release on May 9 showed production topping the high end of guidance at 35.6 MBoe/d, and the Targa NM gas gathering pipeline is tracking for Q3 2026 commercial operations. Twenty-plus wells staged to TIL at once when the pipeline comes online is operationally efficient — it also creates a compressed regulatory and curative window. On the New Mexico side specifically: wells waiting on a pipeline event sometimes surface NMOCD spacing, pooling, or allocation-well questions that are easier to resolve while the wells are pre-production than after they're online. The curative-on-staged-wells window is narrower than it looks. We handle NMOCD regulatory work and Permian Basin title opinions regularly. Both contacts on the list are at Warm stage, so this is a natural check-in against a real program event. If a quick conversation on what to get ahead of before Q3 would be useful, I'm easy to reach. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
Subject + body combined
Subject: Targa Q3 pipeline and 20-plus wells staged to TIL — regulatory timing worth flagging Hi [First Name], Riley's Q1 release on May 9 showed production topping the high end of guidance at 35.6 MBoe/d, and the Targa NM gas gathering pipeline is tracking for Q3 2026 commercial operations. Twenty-plus wells staged to TIL at once when the pipeline comes online is operationally efficient — it also creates a compressed regulatory and curative window. On the New Mexico side specifically: wells waiting on a pipeline event sometimes surface NMOCD spacing, pooling, or allocation-well questions that are easier to resolve while the wells are pre-production than after they're online. The curative-on-staged-wells window is narrower than it looks. We handle NMOCD regulatory work and Permian Basin title opinions regularly. Both contacts on the list are at Warm stage, so this is a natural check-in against a real program event. If a quick conversation on what to get ahead of before Q3 would be useful, I'm easy to reach. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
LinkedIn post (broader pattern — no operator name)
Twenty-plus wells staged to turn in line the day a pipeline comes online is an efficient program. It's also a compressed curative and regulatory timeline. The NMOCD spacing and pooling coordination on wells that are ready to produce but waiting on midstream tends to surface title questions that were easier to resolve before the pipeline event than after. Worth running the regulatory review while the wells are waiting — not when they're ready to flow.
Contacts (4) ·  click to show the list  ·  emails pulled from clients-list.xlsx
NameEmailStage
Ty EdelenNo email address foundUnknown
Chris HarwiNo email address foundUnknown
Michael Palmermichaelpalmer@rileypermian.comWarm
Mark Smithmarksmith@rileypermian.comWarm
BTA Oil Producers ·  9 Cold · 1 Warm  ·  Permian  ·  10 contacts
7/10
Active dual-state Permian program — private operatorTX RRC + NMOCD docket activity · Q1–Q2 2026
Reason to reach out
BTA is a Midland-based private operator running a 3-rig, 28-well-per-year program across West Texas and Eddy County NM — consistent pace, dual-state exposure. Nine of ten contacts currently Cold. The multi-section title and NMOCD compulsory pooling workflow at that rig count is the same as larger operators face — just with less in-house capacity to resolve it. (Source: TX RRC + NMOCD docket, Q1–Q2 2026)
Primary contact: Alex Beal
LinkedIn DM — send to Alex Beal
Alex — BTA's 3-rig Permian program across West Texas and Eddy County stays consistent. Private operators running dual-state programs at that pace hit the same retained-acreage, multi-section title, and NMOCD pooling questions the majors do — the difference is usually in-house capacity to chase them down. If a conversation on what we're seeing on similar programs would be useful, I'm easy to reach. — Ben Holliday, HELG · 210.469.3187
Email subject
BTA's dual-state Permian program — title and pooling patterns worth a conversation
Email body (swap [First Name] when sending)
Hi [First Name], BTA's 3-rig program across West Texas and Eddy County has maintained a consistent pace — 28 wells per year at that scale is a real operational commitment for a private operator. Private operators running dual-state programs at that rig count typically face the same retained-acreage, multi-section title, and NMOCD compulsory pooling questions as the large public operators. The difference tends to be in-house capacity: the questions arrive at the same pace, but the team resolving them is smaller. Two patterns we see regularly on programs like BTA's: the multi-section lateral work where proration units don't map cleanly to the development program, and the NMOCD pooling applications where the pre-application notice workflow has tightened under the new OCD rules. We handle title opinions, NMOCD regulatory work, and compulsory pooling out of San Antonio and Midland. Sole focus on energy. Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law. If 15 minutes on what we're seeing would be useful, I'm easy to reach. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
Subject + body combined
Subject: BTA's dual-state Permian program — title and pooling patterns worth a conversation Hi [First Name], BTA's 3-rig program across West Texas and Eddy County has maintained a consistent pace — 28 wells per year at that scale is a real operational commitment for a private operator. Private operators running dual-state programs at that rig count typically face the same retained-acreage, multi-section title, and NMOCD compulsory pooling questions as the large public operators. The difference tends to be in-house capacity: the questions arrive at the same pace, but the team resolving them is smaller. Two patterns we see regularly on programs like BTA's: the multi-section lateral work where proration units don't map cleanly to the development program, and the NMOCD pooling applications where the pre-application notice workflow has tightened under the new OCD rules. We handle title opinions, NMOCD regulatory work, and compulsory pooling out of San Antonio and Midland. Sole focus on energy. Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law. If 15 minutes on what we're seeing would be useful, I'm easy to reach. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
LinkedIn post (broader pattern — no operator name)
Private operators running 28-well-per-year programs across West Texas and Eddy County face the same retained-acreage, multi-section title, and NMOCD compulsory pooling questions the large public operators face. The difference isn't the complexity of the questions — it's the in-house capacity to resolve them at pace. Worth building the outside-counsel relationship before the contested pooling case arrives, not after.
Contacts (10) ·  click to show the list  ·  emails pulled from clients-list.xlsx
NameEmailStage
Rex BarkerNo email address foundCold
Alex Bealalexbeal@btaoil.comCold
Emma Bolgerebolger@btaoil.comCold
Grant Cavazosgrantmcavazos@gmail.comCold
Collin Christiancollin.christian@btaoil.comWarm
Adam Davenportadavenport@btaoil.comCold
Wilson Pricewprice@btaoil.comCold
Kristeen Ramoskramos@btaoil.comCold
Melinda Teftellerltefteller@btaoil.comCold
Ryan Weaverrweaver@btaoil.comCold

Past Weekly Runs

This is the first weekly run.