HELG
HELG Collision Engine
Week of May 25, 2026
Weekly run. 8 priority companies. Each card has three outreach tabs — LinkedIn DM, Email Draft, LinkedIn Post. Click Contacts to expand the list. Past Monday runs are at the bottom.
Scanned
62
Prioritized
8
High signal (8+)
6
Contacts
177
Cold
32
Warm
9
Client
125

Priority Outreach — sorted by signal score

Devon Energy ·  5 Cold · 12 Client · 2 Unknown  ·  Permian  ·  19 contacts
10/10
$2.6B BLM federal lease acquisition May 21 — 16,300 net acres in Lea/Eddy NM, highest per-acre price in BLM historyDevon Energy press release · May 21, 2026 | GlobeNewswire · May 21, 2026 | BOE Report · May 21, 2026
Reason to reach out
Devon announced four days ago the acquisition of 16,300 net federal acres in Lea and Eddy Counties for $2.6B — highest per-acre price in BLM lease sale history. Federal leases require federal title opinions before drilling permits issue, on 400 net locations. This lands during week three of the Devon-Coterra integration, when the land department is already running hard on JOA re-execution and curative. Scott Richter at Client stage — natural check-in on the federal title workflow now. (Source: Devon Energy press release, May 21, 2026)
Primary contact: Scott Richter
LinkedIn DM — send to Scott Richter
Scott — Devon announced Thursday the acquisition of 16,300 net undeveloped acres in Lea and Eddy Counties through the BLM lease sale — $2.6 billion, or $161,500 per net acre, with one parcel setting the highest per-acre price in BLM lease sale history. Four hundred net locations, federal leases with 87.5% NRI. Federal leases require federal title opinions before drilling permits issue, and the examination workflow on that many locations needs to be scoped before the program schedule is set. This hit in week three of the Coterra integration. If the federal title queue is building, worth a call. — Ben Holliday, HELG · 210.469.3187
Email subject
Devon $2.6B BLM acquisition — federal title workflow on 16,300 net acres in Lea/Eddy
Email body (swap [First Name] when sending)
Hi [First Name], Devon announced Thursday the acquisition of 16,300 net undeveloped acres in Lea and Eddy Counties, New Mexico through the BLM Oil and Gas Lease Sale — $2.6 billion, or approximately $161,500 per net acre. Devon was the largest buyer in the sale and set the highest-ever per-acre price at a BLM lease sale at $357,129 for a single 1,280-acre parcel. Federal leases carry an 87.5% NRI and 10-year primary terms across all depths. The acquisition adds approximately 400 net locations normalized to 2-mile laterals. Federal leasehold requires federal title opinions before BLM drilling permits can be issued — the examination process is distinct from state or private leasehold and can't be batched with standard Permian title workflow. On 400 net locations, scoping and queuing that examination workstream is the first step before the program schedule gets set. This acquisition was announced four days into week three of the Devon-Coterra integration, which means the land department is absorbing a significant new federal inventory addition alongside JOA re-execution and curative work already in progress. We handle federal title opinions and NMOCD regulatory work in Lea and Eddy Counties. Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law, licensed in Texas and New Mexico. If a call to scope the federal title workflow would be useful, I'm easy to reach. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
Subject + body combined
Subject: Devon $2.6B BLM acquisition — federal title workflow on 16,300 net acres in Lea/Eddy Hi [First Name], Devon announced Thursday the acquisition of 16,300 net undeveloped acres in Lea and Eddy Counties, New Mexico through the BLM Oil and Gas Lease Sale — $2.6 billion, or approximately $161,500 per net acre. Devon was the largest buyer in the sale and set the highest-ever per-acre price at a BLM lease sale at $357,129 for a single 1,280-acre parcel. Federal leases carry an 87.5% NRI and 10-year primary terms across all depths. The acquisition adds approximately 400 net locations normalized to 2-mile laterals. Federal leasehold requires federal title opinions before BLM drilling permits can be issued — the examination process is distinct from state or private leasehold and can't be batched with standard Permian title workflow. On 400 net locations, scoping and queuing that examination workstream is the first step before the program schedule gets set. This acquisition was announced four days into week three of the Devon-Coterra integration, which means the land department is absorbing a significant new federal inventory addition alongside JOA re-execution and curative work already in progress. We handle federal title opinions and NMOCD regulatory work in Lea and Eddy Counties. Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law, licensed in Texas and New Mexico. If a call to scope the federal title workflow would be useful, I'm easy to reach. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
LinkedIn post (broader pattern — no operator name)
Devon Energy paid $2.6 billion for 16,300 net federal acres in Lea and Eddy Counties last week — $161,500 per net acre, with one parcel at $357,000 per acre setting the highest price in BLM lease sale history. The acquisition adds 400 net locations, and the announcement landed during week three of a major Delaware Basin merger integration. Federal leases require federal title opinions before drilling permits are issued — that's a different examination workflow than state or private leasehold, and on 400 net locations it's a project that needs to be scoped before the program schedule is confirmed. At $161,500 per net acre, the title work is not the place to find cost savings.
Contacts (19) ·  click to show the list  ·  emails pulled from clients-list.xlsx
NameEmailStage
Matt BeaversNo email address foundCold
Andy BennettNo email address foundUnknown
Keaton CurtisKeaton.Curtis@coterra.comClient
Kevin Gavigankevin.p.gavigan@gmail.com, Kevin.Gavigan@coterra.comCold
Michael HolidayMichael.Holiday@coterra.comClient
Martin HowellNo email address foundCold
Adam MorganAdam.Morgan@coterra.comClient
Blair NutterNo email address foundClient
Dylan Parkdylan.park@coterra.comClient
Colt ParksNo email address foundCold
Megan PowellNo email address foundClient
Scott RichterScott.Richter@coterra.comClient
Trey RobersonTrey.Roberson@coterra.comClient
Ashley St.PierreAshley.StPierre@coterra.comClient
Tristan WalkerTristan.Walker@coterra.comClient
Tristan WalkerNo email address foundCold
Brad WechslerBrad.Wechsler@coterra.comClient
Russell WickmanRussell.Wickman@coterra.comClient
Aaron YoungNo email address foundUnknown
Permian Resources ·  1 Cold · 17 Client  ·  Permian  ·  18 contacts
9/10
Q1 2026 record FCF + investment grade all three agencies + 2026 FCF projection raised to $3.5BPermian Resources Q1 2026 earnings release · May 7, 2026 | Investing.com earnings call transcript | Simply Wall St · May 2026
Reason to reach out
Permian Resources raised 2026 FCF projection to $3.5B — up from $2.6B at February guidance — on the back of Q1 record FCF and WTI averaging $85 vs. $63 estimated. Q2 guidance calls for acceleration. At $725/lateral foot and 25% of wells above 2.5 miles, the retained-acreage and Wolfcamp title work runs on the program's timeline. Seventeen of 18 contacts at Client stage. (Source: Q1 2026 earnings release, May 7, 2026)
Primary contact: Oliver Cho
LinkedIn DM — send to Oliver Cho
Oliver — the 2026 FCF projection moved from $2.6B to $3.5B on the back of Q1 results and WTI holding above $85. At $725 per lateral foot and Q2 guidance calling for higher production and capex, the pace is real. The retained-acreage analysis and stacked-pay Wolfcamp title work in Reeves and Reagan County tends to compress when the program accelerates mid-year. Happy to compare notes on where that work stands in the queue. — Ben Holliday, HELG
Email subject
Permian Resources — $3.5B FCF projection and title pace heading into Q2
Email body (swap [First Name] when sending)
Hi [First Name], Permian Resources' Q1 release raised the 2026 free cash flow projection to $3.5 billion — up from $2.6 billion at the February guidance — driven by WTI averaging approximately $85 per barrel versus the $63 per barrel estimate. Q1 FCF hit $500 million, the highest in company history. Investment grade from S&P, Moody's, and Fitch simultaneously. D&C costs at $725 per lateral foot — lowest in the Delaware Basin peer group — with approximately 25% of wells now exceeding 2.5 miles in lateral length. Q2 guidance calls for higher production and capital expenditures. At $725 per lateral foot and a $3.5B full-year FCF target, the program is moving fast. The retained-acreage analysis on legacy Reeves and Reagan leasehold and the stacked-pay Wolfcamp depth-severance questions surface on the program's timeline — not on the land team's schedule. With seventeen of eighteen contacts at Client stage, this is a natural check-in against a real quarter. Quick 15 minutes when it works? Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
Subject + body combined
Subject: Permian Resources — $3.5B FCF projection and title pace heading into Q2 Hi [First Name], Permian Resources' Q1 release raised the 2026 free cash flow projection to $3.5 billion — up from $2.6 billion at the February guidance — driven by WTI averaging approximately $85 per barrel versus the $63 per barrel estimate. Q1 FCF hit $500 million, the highest in company history. Investment grade from S&P, Moody's, and Fitch simultaneously. D&C costs at $725 per lateral foot — lowest in the Delaware Basin peer group — with approximately 25% of wells now exceeding 2.5 miles in lateral length. Q2 guidance calls for higher production and capital expenditures. At $725 per lateral foot and a $3.5B full-year FCF target, the program is moving fast. The retained-acreage analysis on legacy Reeves and Reagan leasehold and the stacked-pay Wolfcamp depth-severance questions surface on the program's timeline — not on the land team's schedule. With seventeen of eighteen contacts at Client stage, this is a natural check-in against a real quarter. Quick 15 minutes when it works? Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
LinkedIn post (broader pattern — no operator name)
A 2026 free cash flow projection of $3.5 billion — up from $2.6 billion at February guidance — reflects what a $725-per-lateral-foot Delaware Basin program looks like when oil prices hold higher than expected. The pace that generates that FCF is the same pace that surfaces retained-acreage and stacked-pay Wolfcamp questions on Reeves and Reagan County leasehold. On a program targeting 25% of wells above 2.5 miles in length, the title work on multi-section proration units doesn't manage itself.
Contacts (18) ·  click to show the list  ·  emails pulled from clients-list.xlsx
NameEmailStage
Oliver ChoOliver.Cho@permianres.comClient
Hayden ClyceHayden.Clyce@permianres.comClient
Logan CookseyNo email address foundClient
Ryan Curryryan@vfpetroleum.comClient
Patrick GodwinNo email address foundCold
Matthew GrayMatthew.Gray@permianres.comClient
Mark Hajdikmark.hajdik@permianres.comClient
Kelsi HenriquesKelsi.Henriques@permianres.comClient
Jon-aaron Housejon-aaron.house@conocophillips.comClient
Michael Hurlbutmichael.hurlbut@permianres.comClient
Trevor Irbytrevor.irby@permianres.comClient
Sean JohnsonSean.Johnson@permianres.comClient
Matt Jordanmatt.jordan@permianres.comClient
Daniel KouryDaniel.Koury@permianres.comClient
Brian PondBrian.Pond@permainres.comClient
Adam RekerNo email address foundClient
Drew TarwaterNo email address foundClient
Alexa Wolfalexa.wolf@permianres.comClient
Diamondback Energy ·  19 Cold · 5 Warm · 1 Unknown  ·  Permian  ·  25 contacts
9/10
Fastest Barnett well on record — 18 days, under $400/lateral foot — full-scale H2 2026 launch confirmedDiamondback Q1 2026 earnings release + investor presentation · May 5, 2026 | TipRanks · May 2026 | Bitget News
Reason to reach out
Diamondback drilled its fastest Barnett well ever — 18 days at under $400/lateral foot — which moves the full-scale H2 2026 launch from a pace question to an execution question. Full-scale means 100 gross wells/year by 2027 across 200,000 net Midland acres. The depth-severance and retained-acreage title work on stacked Barnett/Wolfcamp development needs to run ahead of that pace, not alongside it. Matt Midkiff at Warm stage. (Source: Diamondback Q1 2026 earnings, May 5, 2026)
Primary contact: Matt Midkiff
LinkedIn DM — send to Matt Midkiff
Matt — the fastest Barnett well on record came in at under $400 per lateral foot and 18 days. At that cost, the Barnett is trending toward core portfolio competitiveness ahead of the H2 full-scale launch. Full-scale means 100 gross wells per year from 2027 across 200,000 net Midland acres. The depth-severance language in legacy Midland Basin deeds wasn't written for stacked Barnett development at that pace. If those questions are building in the queue, worth a call before the program is at full pace. — Ben Holliday, HELG · 210.469.3187
Email subject
Barnett fastest well — 18 days, under $400/ft — title work before full-scale H2 launch
Email body (swap [First Name] when sending)
Hi [First Name], Diamondback disclosed this quarter that its fastest Barnett well came in at approximately 18 days drill time at under $400 per lateral foot — the lowest Barnett well cost in company history. That compares to a current program average well above that level and puts the Barnett trajectory on a path toward core portfolio competitiveness ahead of the stated H2 2026 full-scale development launch. Full-scale means approximately 30 gross Barnett wells this year and a target of around 100 gross wells per year from 2027, with laterals growing from 11,500 to 13,000 feet and eventually 15,000-foot multi-pad development across 200,000 net Midland Basin acres. The title work on stacked Barnett/Wolfcamp development across that acreage is specific. Depth-severance language in pre-1970s deeds was not written for multi-formation horizontal development, and the retained-acreage analysis on proration units carrying both Wolfcamp and Barnett depths is a project that needs to run ahead of the full-scale program — not alongside it at 100 wells per year. We handle Midland Basin title work regularly. Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law, licensed in Texas and New Mexico. If 15 minutes to discuss the title workflow before the H2 launch makes sense, I'd welcome the conversation. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
Subject + body combined
Subject: Barnett fastest well — 18 days, under $400/ft — title work before full-scale H2 launch Hi [First Name], Diamondback disclosed this quarter that its fastest Barnett well came in at approximately 18 days drill time at under $400 per lateral foot — the lowest Barnett well cost in company history. That compares to a current program average well above that level and puts the Barnett trajectory on a path toward core portfolio competitiveness ahead of the stated H2 2026 full-scale development launch. Full-scale means approximately 30 gross Barnett wells this year and a target of around 100 gross wells per year from 2027, with laterals growing from 11,500 to 13,000 feet and eventually 15,000-foot multi-pad development across 200,000 net Midland Basin acres. The title work on stacked Barnett/Wolfcamp development across that acreage is specific. Depth-severance language in pre-1970s deeds was not written for multi-formation horizontal development, and the retained-acreage analysis on proration units carrying both Wolfcamp and Barnett depths is a project that needs to run ahead of the full-scale program — not alongside it at 100 wells per year. We handle Midland Basin title work regularly. Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law, licensed in Texas and New Mexico. If 15 minutes to discuss the title workflow before the H2 launch makes sense, I'd welcome the conversation. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
LinkedIn post (broader pattern — no operator name)
An 18-day Barnett well at under $400 per lateral foot is a data point that changes the H2 2026 full-scale launch from a cost question to an execution question. When the formation that was delineating at $1,000 per foot starts drilling at $400, the program steps up faster than the title queue. Stacked Barnett/Wolfcamp development across 200,000 net acres of legacy Midland Basin leasehold surfaces depth-severance language in pre-1970s deeds and retained-acreage questions on proration units that weren't designed for two-formation horizontal development. The time to work those questions is before 100 wells per year, not during.
Contacts (25) ·  click to show the list  ·  emails pulled from clients-list.xlsx
NameEmailStage
Danielle Andersonldanderson@diamondbackenergy.comCold
Laura Barnettlbarnett@diamondbackenergy.comCold
Jaydan BirdJbird@diamondbackenergy.comCold
Greg Boggsgboggs@diamondbackenergy.comCold
Randis ButtsNo email address foundCold
Bill CarawayNo email address foundUnknown
Kevin Dickersonkdickerson@diamondbackenergy.comCold
Neil DuffordNo email address foundCold
Chas Gauthiercgauth@gmail.comWarm
Jennifer Georgejgeorge@diamondbackenergy.comCold
Mandy Hendrixmhendrix@diamondbackenergy.comCold
Jason Hensonjhenson@diamondbackenergy.comCold
Tyler HumphriesNo email address foundCold
Joseph Jarkejjarke@diamondbackenergy.comWarm
Ryan KellyNo email address foundCold
Matt Midkiffmmidkiff@diamondbackenergy.comWarm
Matthew MidkiffNo email address foundCold
Katayoun Mohebkhosravikmoheb@diamondbackenergy.comCold
Drew Neagledneagle@diamondbackenergy.comCold
Michael OwenNo email address foundCold
Kyle Piercekpierce@diamondbackenergy.comCold
Aaron Tanneratanner@diamondbackenergy.comCold
Chase Van Winklecvanwinkle@diamondbackenergy.comWarm
Andrew Wallerawaller@diamondbackenergy.comWarm
Amanda Winklerawinkler@diamondbackenergy.comCold
EOG Resources ·  1 Warm · 36 Client  ·  Permian  ·  37 contacts
8/10
Mid-year capital reallocation: 5 net Delaware Basin completions added, Dorado scaled back — $8.5B 2026 FCF projectedEOG Resources Q1 2026 earnings release · May 5, 2026 | RBN Energy · May 2026 | TipRanks · May 2026 | GuruFocus · May 2026
Reason to reach out
EOG added 5 net Delaware Basin completions to the 2026 program mid-year, funded by scaling back Dorado. Adding confirmed completion locations mid-year means those locations need current title opinions before operations begin — incremental locations that weren't in the original queue. $8.5B 2026 FCF projection signals the program is running hard. 37 contacts, nearly all Client stage. Laurie Archer at Client stage — natural check-in. (Source: EOG Q1 2026 earnings release, May 5, 2026)
Primary contact: Laurie Archer
LinkedIn DM — send to Laurie Archer
Laurie — EOG added 5 net Delaware Basin completions and 10 net Utica completions to the 2026 program on a flat capital budget, funded by reducing Dorado production. Adding confirmed completion locations mid-year means those locations need title opinions that weren't already in the queue. The pace on the Permian side — $8.5 billion in projected 2026 free cash flow — suggests the program isn't slowing down. If the Delaware Basin title queue has picked up on the incremental locations, worth a call. — Ben Holliday, HELG · 210.469.3187
Email subject
EOG Delaware Basin completions addition — incremental title work on 5 net locations
Email body (swap [First Name] when sending)
Hi [First Name], EOG's Q1 release on May 5 disclosed a mid-year capital reallocation: five net additional Delaware Basin completions and ten net Utica completions added to the 2026 program on a flat $6.5 billion capital budget, funded by reducing Dorado (South Texas dry gas) production from approximately 1 Bcf/d to just over 800 MMcf/d. Q1 adjusted EPS came in at $3.41 versus the $3.23 consensus estimate. Projected 2026 free cash flow is $8.5 billion. Adding confirmed completion locations mid-year creates a specific title work situation: those locations need current Delaware Basin title opinions before operations begin, and they weren't in the original program schedule. The incremental five net completions represent meaningful additional title work against a land team running at full pace on the original program. With 37 contacts at Client and Warm stage across Permian, Eagle Ford, Utica, and North Dakota — the second-largest company concentration on the list — this is a natural check-in as the program expands. Quick 15 minutes when it works? Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
Subject + body combined
Subject: EOG Delaware Basin completions addition — incremental title work on 5 net locations Hi [First Name], EOG's Q1 release on May 5 disclosed a mid-year capital reallocation: five net additional Delaware Basin completions and ten net Utica completions added to the 2026 program on a flat $6.5 billion capital budget, funded by reducing Dorado (South Texas dry gas) production from approximately 1 Bcf/d to just over 800 MMcf/d. Q1 adjusted EPS came in at $3.41 versus the $3.23 consensus estimate. Projected 2026 free cash flow is $8.5 billion. Adding confirmed completion locations mid-year creates a specific title work situation: those locations need current Delaware Basin title opinions before operations begin, and they weren't in the original program schedule. The incremental five net completions represent meaningful additional title work against a land team running at full pace on the original program. With 37 contacts at Client and Warm stage across Permian, Eagle Ford, Utica, and North Dakota — the second-largest company concentration on the list — this is a natural check-in as the program expands. Quick 15 minutes when it works? Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
LinkedIn post (broader pattern — no operator name)
A flat capital budget that reallocates from dry gas toward oil-weighted Delaware Basin completions — and raises oil guidance in the same announcement — is a program responding efficiently to price signals. Adding 5 net Permian completions and 10 net Utica completions mid-year means those locations need title opinions that weren't already in the original program queue. On a program projecting $8.5 billion in 2026 free cash flow, the title workstream on incremental locations needs to run alongside the reallocation decision, not after it.
Contacts (37) ·  click to show the list  ·  emails pulled from clients-list.xlsx
NameEmailStage
Laurie Archerlaurie_Archer@eogresources.comClient
Gary Barkergary_barker@eogresources.comClient
James BarwissJames_Barwis@eogresources.comClient
Taylor Bellowstaylor_bellows@eogresources.comClient
Vivian Beltranvivian_beltran@eogresources.comClient
Dustin Bynumdustin_bynum@eogresources.comClient
Elizabeth Castilloelizabeth_castillo@eogresources.comClient
Tatum Dolantatum_dolan@eogresources.comClient
Riker Everettriker_everett@eogresources.comClient
Austin FryeNo email address foundClient
Pat Graypgray@bpgray.comWarm
Clay Haggardclay_haggard@eogresources.comClient
Skyler Hendersonskyler_henderson@eogresources.comClient
Stephen Himessteve_himes@eogresources.comClient
Katie JirasekKatie_Jirasek@eogresources.comClient
Jamin JonesNo email address foundClient
Taylor Jordantracy_jordan@eogresources.comClient
Judy Kirianjudy_kirian@eogresources.comClient
Erin Lloyderin_lloyd@eogresources.comClient
Katie McbrydeKatie_McBryde@eogresources.comClient
Casey OttNo email address foundClient
Josh Pitmanjosh_pitman@eogresources.comClient
Chloe Sawtellechloe_sawtelle@eogresources.comClient
Dax ShepherdNo email address foundClient
Bella Sikesbella_sikes@eogresources.comClient
Drew Simmonsdrew_simmons@eogresources.comClient
Evan SimmonsNo email address foundClient
Matt Smithmatthew_smith@eogresources.comClient
Graham SteeleNo email address foundClient
Nathan StephensonNo email address foundClient
Richard Stewartrichard_stewart@eogresources.comClient
Cassie Stonedalecassie_stonedale@eogresources.comClient
Laci Stretcherlaci_stretcher@eogresources.comClient
Ellarie Suttonellarie_sutton@eogresources.comClient
Damon Wegerdamon_weger@eogresources.comClient
Michael YemmMichael_Yemm@eogresources.comClient
Sherman Youngsherman_young@eogresources.comClient
ConocoPhillips ·  60 Client · 6 Unknown  ·  Permian  ·  66 contacts
8/10
$2B Permian Delaware Basin asset sale — three months in, process approaching shortlist stageBloomberg · February 20, 2026 | World Oil · February 20, 2026 | ConocoPhillips Q1 2026 8-K · April 30, 2026
Reason to reach out
ConocoPhillips' $2B Delaware Basin asset sale process is three months old. At this stage, buyer shortlists are typically forming, data rooms are opening, and buy-side title due diligence timelines get compressed by the deal schedule. Buy-side title on legacy Concho and Shell positions that changed hands at least twice is a project that needs to start before exclusivity. Sixty-six Client-stage contacts in Midland. (Source: Bloomberg, World Oil · February 20, 2026)
Primary contact: Adam Altenhofen
LinkedIn DM — send to Adam Altenhofen
Adam — ConocoPhillips' $2B Delaware Basin asset sale process has been public since February. At three months in, buyer shortlists are typically forming and data rooms are opening. Buy-side title coverage on Delaware Basin leasehold that has changed hands at least twice — Concho, then COP, potentially a third buyer — is a project that needs to be scoped before the exclusivity period, not during it. If there's anything useful on the title front on either side, I'm easy to reach. — Ben Holliday, HELG · 210.469.3187
Email subject
ConocoPhillips $2B Permian process — three months in, title workflow on both sides
Email body (swap [First Name] when sending)
Hi [First Name], ConocoPhillips' exploration of a $2B Delaware Basin asset sale — legacy Concho Resources and Shell Plc positions in West Texas and New Mexico — has been public since February 20. At three months in, processes of this size typically move toward buyer shortlists, data room access, and buy-side counsel positioning on the title due diligence timeline. On legacy Concho and Shell leasehold that has changed hands at least twice, the curative resolution from prior closings is often incomplete — that gap surfaces fastest when a new buyer's title examiner reviews the chain under time pressure. Buy-side title coverage at $2B scale is a project that needs to be scoped and started before the exclusivity period begins, not after. On the sell-side, clean title packages with documented curative reduce buyer discount requests and protect the timeline to close. We handle A&D due diligence and title opinions across the Delaware Basin. With sixty-six Client-stage contacts in Midland, this is a natural check-in. If a 15-minute conversation on the title workflow — on either side — would be useful, I'm easy to reach. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
Subject + body combined
Subject: ConocoPhillips $2B Permian process — three months in, title workflow on both sides Hi [First Name], ConocoPhillips' exploration of a $2B Delaware Basin asset sale — legacy Concho Resources and Shell Plc positions in West Texas and New Mexico — has been public since February 20. At three months in, processes of this size typically move toward buyer shortlists, data room access, and buy-side counsel positioning on the title due diligence timeline. On legacy Concho and Shell leasehold that has changed hands at least twice, the curative resolution from prior closings is often incomplete — that gap surfaces fastest when a new buyer's title examiner reviews the chain under time pressure. Buy-side title coverage at $2B scale is a project that needs to be scoped and started before the exclusivity period begins, not after. On the sell-side, clean title packages with documented curative reduce buyer discount requests and protect the timeline to close. We handle A&D due diligence and title opinions across the Delaware Basin. With sixty-six Client-stage contacts in Midland, this is a natural check-in. If a 15-minute conversation on the title workflow — on either side — would be useful, I'm easy to reach. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
LinkedIn post (broader pattern — no operator name)
A $2 billion Delaware Basin asset sale process that has been public for three months is approaching the stage where buyer shortlists form, data rooms open, and buy-side title due diligence timelines get set by the deal schedule rather than by outside counsel. Legacy Concho Resources and Shell positions in West Texas and New Mexico have changed hands at least twice. The curative from prior closings may or may not have been run to completion. Buy-side title coverage on Delaware Basin leasehold at that scale needs to start before the exclusivity window opens — not during it.
Contacts (66) ·  click to show the list  ·  emails pulled from clients-list.xlsx
NameEmailStage
Marc AcuffNo email address foundUnknown
Adam Altenhofenadam.altenhofen@conocophillips.comClient
Stephanie Ashleystephanie.ashley@conocophillips.comClient
Brandon Beversdorfbrandon.beversdorf@conocophillips.comClient
John Bowmanjohn.e.bowman@conocophillips.comClient
Henry Callehenry.calle@conocophillips.comClient
Mark Cartermark.carter2@conocophillips.comClient
Wilson Cashwilson.cash@conocophillips.comClient
Jackie Chattertonjackie.chatterton@conocophillips.comClient
Matt Darbymatt.darby@conocophillips.comClient
Brian Dartbrian.c.dart@cop.comClient
Elisabeth Daviselisabeth.f.davis@conocophillips.comClient
Clint Devillierclint.devillier@conocophillips.comClient
Melissa Dimitmelissa.dimit@conocophillips.comClient
Ben EisterholdNo email address foundUnknown
Debbie Evansdebbie.evans@conocophillips.comClient
Shaina Ferrellshaina.j.ferrell@conocophillips.comClient
Caroline Frederickcaroline.frederick@conocophillips.comClient
Joseph Geigerjoseph.geiger@conocophillips.comClient
Kelsey Gilbertkelsey.gilbert@conocophillips.comClient
Courtney Goggincourtney.goggin@conocophillips.comClient
Kayla Halekayla.hale@conocophillips.comClient
Brian Hallbrian.hall@conocophillips.comClient
Ashley HansenNo email address foundUnknown
Eric HernandezNo email address foundClient
Catie Hillcatie.hill@conocophillips.comClient
Caroline Hobancaroline.hoban@conocophillips.comClient
Jared Hobbsjared.hobbs@conocophillips.comClient
Aaron Hunteraaron.hunter@conocophillips.comClient
Kevin Irwinkevin.irwin@conocophillips.comClient
Davis Johnsondavis.d.johnson@conocophillips.comClient
Dean JoshuaJosh.Dean@conocophillips.comClient
Brian Joyabrian.joya@conocophillips.comClient
Andrew KendallAndrew.Kendall@conocophillips.comClient
Jeff Kliewerjeff.kliewer@conocophillips.comClient
Shelley KlinglerNo email address foundUnknown
Leah M. LawdermilkLeah.M.Lawdermilk@conocophillips.comClient
Brian Leveabrian.levea@conocophillips.comClient
Zach Marshzach.marsh@concophillips.comClient
Scott McbeeNo email address foundClient
Kim Mccarverkim.r.mccarver@conocophillips.comClient
Mason MclennaNo email address foundClient
Kieran Mcmullenkieran.mcmullen@conocophillips.comClient
Sarah Midkiffsarah.h.midkiff@conocophillips.comClient
Sean Millersean.miller@conocophillips.comClient
Joey Moppertjoey.moppert@conocophillips.comClient
Becca Morrisbecca.morris@conocophillips.comClient
Jason Parkerjason.c.parker@conocophillips.comClient
Beth Ryanbeth.ryan@conocophillips.comClient
Brooks Sitkabrooks.sitka@conocophillips.comClient
Leslie Rountree Smithleslie.rountreesmith@conocophillips.comClient
Benjamin Steckerben.stecker@conocophillips.comClient
Mackayla Stonemackayla.stone@conocophillips.comClient
Jeffrey Stoutjeff.s.stout@conocophillips.comClient
John Stretcherjsstretcher@gmail.comClient
Robert StumpfNo email address foundClient
Maribel Torresmaribel.torres@conocophillips.comClient
Chad TshirhardtNo email address foundUnknown
Macie VallesNo email address foundClient
Joann Velasquezjoann.velasquez@conocophillips.comClient
Chris VirantNo email address foundClient
Steve VirantNo email address foundUnknown
Johnna Williamsjohnna.williams@conocophillips.comClient
Justin Williamsjustin.k.williams@cop.comClient
Cash WilsonNo email address foundClient
Henry Zollingerhenry.zollinger@conocophillips.comClient
Crescent Energy ·  4 Cold  ·  Permian  ·  4 contacts
8/10
Q1 record 341 MBoe/d + $355M Eagle Ford minerals acquisitions closed + $120M synergies at 120% of targetCrescent Energy Q1 2026 earnings release · May 5, 2026 | BusinessWire Eagle Ford announcement · February 2026 | Globe and Mail · May 2026
Reason to reach out
Crescent closed two Eagle Ford minerals acquisitions totaling $355M in February, reported record 341 MBoe/d in Q1, and is running a 6-7 rig program. Minerals title in Eagle Ford is distinct from leasehold title — heirship, minerals chain, and curative are a different workflow running simultaneously with an active operating program. All four contacts Cold — no prior HELG relationship. (Source: Crescent Q1 2026 earnings + BusinessWire, February 2026)
Primary contact: David Hansen
LinkedIn DM — send to David Hansen
David — Crescent closed two Eagle Ford minerals acquisitions totaling $355M in February and reported record Q1 production at 341 MBoe/d on a 6-7 rig program. Minerals acquisitions in Eagle Ford carry a specific title and curative workflow — the minerals chain and heirship resolution are distinct from leasehold title, and running that alongside an active operating program at 85% simulfrac utilization compresses the queue. We work that pattern in Eagle Ford regularly. If any of it is landing on your desk, worth a conversation. — Ben Holliday, HELG · 210.469.3187
Email subject
Crescent Q1 record + $355M Eagle Ford minerals acquisitions — title on two tracks
Email body (swap [First Name] when sending)
Hi [First Name], Creescent announced two Eagle Ford minerals acquisitions totaling approximately $355 million in February 2026, alongside 2026 production guidance of 320–335 MBoe/d and a 6-7 rig program. Q1 came in at record 341 MBoe/d — above guidance — with $120M in Permian synergies captured at 120% of the original target and Permian well costs reduced by over $500,000 per well versus the prior Vital Energy operator. Minerals acquisitions in Eagle Ford carry a specific title and curative workflow that is distinct from fee or leasehold title: the minerals chain, heirship resolution, and curative on acquired interests require a different examination approach, and that workflow needs to run concurrently with the operating program rather than behind it. At 85% simulfrac utilization, the operating program isn't creating slack in the schedule. We handle Eagle Ford minerals title and curative, leasehold title opinions, and A&D due diligence across South Texas and the Delaware Basin. Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law, licensed in Texas and New Mexico. If a 15-minute conversation on where the title work stands on the acquired minerals would be useful, I'm easy to reach. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
Subject + body combined
Subject: Crescent Q1 record + $355M Eagle Ford minerals acquisitions — title on two tracks Hi [First Name], Creescent announced two Eagle Ford minerals acquisitions totaling approximately $355 million in February 2026, alongside 2026 production guidance of 320–335 MBoe/d and a 6-7 rig program. Q1 came in at record 341 MBoe/d — above guidance — with $120M in Permian synergies captured at 120% of the original target and Permian well costs reduced by over $500,000 per well versus the prior Vital Energy operator. Minerals acquisitions in Eagle Ford carry a specific title and curative workflow that is distinct from fee or leasehold title: the minerals chain, heirship resolution, and curative on acquired interests require a different examination approach, and that workflow needs to run concurrently with the operating program rather than behind it. At 85% simulfrac utilization, the operating program isn't creating slack in the schedule. We handle Eagle Ford minerals title and curative, leasehold title opinions, and A&D due diligence across South Texas and the Delaware Basin. Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law, licensed in Texas and New Mexico. If a 15-minute conversation on where the title work stands on the acquired minerals would be useful, I'm easy to reach. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
LinkedIn post (broader pattern — no operator name)
Two Eagle Ford minerals acquisitions totaling $355 million, closed earlier this year, alongside a record Q1 production result and a 6-7 rig program running at 85% simulfrac utilization. The title and curative workflow on minerals acquisitions in Eagle Ford is distinct from leasehold title — heirship resolution, minerals chain, and curative on acquired interests require a different examination process. Running that workflow in parallel with an active operating program leaves a narrow window for the title queue to stay current.
Contacts (4) ·  click to show the list  ·  emails pulled from clients-list.xlsx
NameEmailStage
David HansenNo email address foundCold
Glen HodgeNo email address foundCold
Robert MatusekNo email address foundCold
Zach MorganNo email address foundCold
Mewbourne Oil ·  3 Cold · 1 Warm  ·  Permian  ·  4 contacts
7/10
June 23 OCD Examiner hearing — 29 days out — Bone Spring pooling cases 25860/25862 vs. WPXNMOCD OCD hearing calendar · May–June 2026 | EMNRD docket No. 20-26 · May 7, 2026 | EMNRD hearing information page
Reason to reach out
June 23 OCD Examiner hearing on cases 25860/25862 is 29 days out. Pre-hearing window to confirm the October 2025 pre-application notice record and good-faith negotiation documentation is open now. Those two items are where contested Bone Spring matters stall under current OCD requirements. Josh Anderson at Warm stage — right time to reach out. (Source: NMOCD OCD docket activity, May–June 2026)
Primary contact: Josh Anderson
LinkedIn DM — send to Josh Anderson
Josh — the June 23 OCD Examiner hearing on cases 25860 and 25862 is 29 days out. That's the right window to confirm the pre-application notice record and good-faith negotiation documentation are in order under the October 2025 requirements — those are the two places contested Bone Spring matters stall before the examiner, not the substantive spacing arguments. If it would be useful to walk through the hearing posture and the pre-application record, I'm easy to reach. — Ben Holliday, HELG
Email subject
June 23 OCD Examiner hearing — 29 days out — cases 25860 and 25862 Bone Spring pooling
Email body (swap [First Name] when sending)
Hi [First Name], The June 23 OCD Examiner hearing on Mewbourne cases 25860 and 25862 — Bone Spring pooling in Eddy County, Sections 14 and 15, Township 18 South, Range 29 East — is 29 days out. The hearing brings those cases before the examiner alongside WPX cases 26049 through 26052. Twenty-nine days is a workable pre-hearing window to confirm that the notice workflow ran correctly under the October 2025 NMOCD pre-application filing requirements and that the good-faith negotiation documentation is in order. Under the October requirements, those are the two places where contested Bone Spring matters most commonly draw objections at the examiner phase — the notice process and the negotiation record, not the substantive spacing arguments. We monitor the NMOCD docket in Eddy and Lea Counties and handle compulsory pooling proceedings regularly. If walking through the hearing posture and pre-application record ahead of June 23 would be useful, I'm easy to reach. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
Subject + body combined
Subject: June 23 OCD Examiner hearing — 29 days out — cases 25860 and 25862 Bone Spring pooling Hi [First Name], The June 23 OCD Examiner hearing on Mewbourne cases 25860 and 25862 — Bone Spring pooling in Eddy County, Sections 14 and 15, Township 18 South, Range 29 East — is 29 days out. The hearing brings those cases before the examiner alongside WPX cases 26049 through 26052. Twenty-nine days is a workable pre-hearing window to confirm that the notice workflow ran correctly under the October 2025 NMOCD pre-application filing requirements and that the good-faith negotiation documentation is in order. Under the October requirements, those are the two places where contested Bone Spring matters most commonly draw objections at the examiner phase — the notice process and the negotiation record, not the substantive spacing arguments. We monitor the NMOCD docket in Eddy and Lea Counties and handle compulsory pooling proceedings regularly. If walking through the hearing posture and pre-application record ahead of June 23 would be useful, I'm easy to reach. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
LinkedIn post (broader pattern — no operator name)
Twenty-nine days to a New Mexico OCD Examiner hearing is the right time to confirm two things: the notice workflow ran correctly under the October 2025 pre-application requirements, and the good-faith negotiation record is documented in a form the examiner will accept. On contested Bone Spring matters in Eddy County, those are the two points where cases slip — not the substantive spacing arguments. Pre-hearing preparation on the notice record and negotiation documentation is easier before the docket is compressed than the week before the hearing.
Contacts (4) ·  click to show the list  ·  emails pulled from clients-list.xlsx
NameEmailStage
Josh Andersonjanderson@mewbourne.comWarm
Brad Dunnbdunn@mewbourne.comCold
Corey Mitchellcmitchell@mewbourne.comCold
Ariana Rodriguesarodrigues@mewbourne.comCold
Riley Permian ·  2 Warm · 2 Unknown  ·  OKC  ·  4 contacts
7/10
Q3 Targa NM pipeline TIL window live now — two rigs tapering after May, 20+ wells stagedRiley Exploration Permian Q1 2026 earnings call summary · May 2026 | Yahoo Finance · May 2026 | Oil & Gas Journal · December 2025 | TipRanks
Reason to reach out
Riley's two-rig program is tapering after May on a front-loaded CapEx schedule, with Q3 Targa pipeline TIL still the target. Twenty-plus wells staged means the NMOCD regulatory and curative window is live now — and that window is most useful before the rig count drops and the pipeline construction period begins to compress it. Michael Palmer and Mark Smith both at Warm stage. (Source: Riley Permian Q1 2026 earnings call, May 2026)
Primary contact: Michael Palmer
LinkedIn DM — send to Michael Palmer
Michael — the two-rig program is wrapping up May before activity tapers, and the Targa NM pipeline is on track for Q3 commercial operations. With 20-plus wells staged for simultaneous TIL, the NMOCD regulatory coordination and curative on those wells is most efficiently handled now — while the rigs are still running and the wells are pre-production — rather than after the pipeline construction period starts compressing the timeline. Happy to compare notes on where the regulatory queue stands. — Ben Holliday, HELG
Email subject
Q3 Targa NM pipeline — regulatory and curative window open now, rigs tapering after May
Email body (swap [First Name] when sending)
Hi [First Name], Riley's $200M 2026 CapEx program is front-loaded to the first half, with two rigs running through May before activity tapers. Q3 commercial operations for the Targa NM high-pressure trunk line remain on track, with 20-plus wells staged to turn in line simultaneously on pipeline startup. The window to resolve NMOCD regulatory coordination and curative work on those staged New Mexico wells is most useful now — while the rig activity is still elevated and the wells are pre-production. After the rigs taper and the pipeline construction period advances, the timeline compresses against a Q3 infrastructure deadline rather than the land team's schedule. With >20% oil growth guidance and a front-loaded program, the Q3 TIL event is the critical path item. The NMOCD spacing, pooling, and allocation-well questions on staged wells are easier to resolve with lead time than under a production startup deadline. We handle NMOCD regulatory proceedings and New Mexico Permian Basin title work regularly. Both contacts on the list are at Warm stage. If a quick call on what to get ahead of before the rigs taper would be useful, I'm easy to reach. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
Subject + body combined
Subject: Q3 Targa NM pipeline — regulatory and curative window open now, rigs tapering after May Hi [First Name], Riley's $200M 2026 CapEx program is front-loaded to the first half, with two rigs running through May before activity tapers. Q3 commercial operations for the Targa NM high-pressure trunk line remain on track, with 20-plus wells staged to turn in line simultaneously on pipeline startup. The window to resolve NMOCD regulatory coordination and curative work on those staged New Mexico wells is most useful now — while the rig activity is still elevated and the wells are pre-production. After the rigs taper and the pipeline construction period advances, the timeline compresses against a Q3 infrastructure deadline rather than the land team's schedule. With >20% oil growth guidance and a front-loaded program, the Q3 TIL event is the critical path item. The NMOCD spacing, pooling, and allocation-well questions on staged wells are easier to resolve with lead time than under a production startup deadline. We handle NMOCD regulatory proceedings and New Mexico Permian Basin title work regularly. Both contacts on the list are at Warm stage. If a quick call on what to get ahead of before the rigs taper would be useful, I'm easy to reach. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187 · Ben@HELG.law
LinkedIn post (broader pattern — no operator name)
A front-loaded CapEx program tapering after May, a Q3 Targa pipeline startup, and 20-plus wells staged to turn in line simultaneously. The NMOCD regulatory coordination and curative on staged New Mexico wells is most efficiently resolved while the rigs are still running and the wells are pre-production — not after the pipeline construction period has started and the TIL window has compressed. The time to work those questions is now, before the rig count drops and the Q3 infrastructure deadline starts setting the pace.
Contacts (4) ·  click to show the list  ·  emails pulled from clients-list.xlsx
NameEmailStage
Ty EdelenNo email address foundUnknown
Chris HarwiNo email address foundUnknown
Michael Palmermichaelpalmer@rileypermian.comWarm
Mark Smithmarksmith@rileypermian.comWarm

Past Weekly Runs