HELG Collision Dashboard — Week of June 22, 2026

Weekly run. 8 priority companies. Each card has three outreach tabs — LinkedIn DM, Email Draft, LinkedIn Post. Click Contacts to expand the list. Past Monday runs are at the bottom.

Scanned

Prioritized

High signal (8+)

Contacts

177

Cold

Warm

Client

125

Priority Outreach — sorted by signal score

Devon Energy · 5 Cold · 12 Client · 2 Unknown · Permian · 19 contacts

9/10

Devon-Coterra merger CLOSED June 9 — combined 2026 guidance issued (1.38 MMBoe/d, 500 MBbl/d oil); note exchange 97.78% tendered, expires June 23; $1.25B debt retirement; integration co-led by Trey Lowe and Blake SirgoDevon Energy SEC Form 8-K — 2026 production outlook and capital plan following Coterra merger - June 2026 | Devon-Coterra merger close - June 9, 2026 | Devon early participation results, private exchange offers - June 5, 2026 (StockTitan) | Invezz - analyst coverage, DVN +6% - June 10, 2026

Reason to reach out

The Devon-Coterra merger closed June 9 — it was pending a week ago, and now the integration is live. Combined guidance is out (1.38 MMBoe/d, 500 MBbl/d oil), the note exchange closes June 23, and the land department is into JOA re-execution and title rationalization across the combined Delaware Basin position. The federal acreage in that position needs federal title opinions before BLM permits issue, and that examination runs on its own track. (Source: Devon Form 8-K, June 2026; merger close June 9, 2026)

Primary contact: Scott Richter

LinkedIn DM — send to Scott Richter

Scott — the Devon-Coterra merger closed June 9, so the integration is now live rather than pending. Combined 2026 guidance came out at close: roughly 1.38 million Boe/d, 500,000 barrels of oil per day, with $1.25 billion of debt retirement planned this year. The note exchange drew 97.78% participation on certain series and expires June 23. On the land side, the team is into JOA re-execution and title rationalization across the combined Delaware Basin position, and the federal acreage there needs federal title opinions before BLM permits issue — a separate examination workflow from state or private leasehold. If outside bandwidth on the federal title queue would help while integration is at its peak, worth a short conversation. — Ben Holliday, HELG · 210.469.3187

Email subject

Devon/Coterra — merger closed June 9, combined guidance out, federal title queue now live

Email body (swap [First Name] when sending)

Hi [First Name], The Devon-Coterra merger closed June 9 — pending a week ago, now done. Combined 2026 guidance issued at close puts production near 1.38 million Boe/d, including 500,000 barrels of oil per day, with $1.25 billion of debt retirement planned for the year and a target of $600 million in annual cost reductions by 2027. The private exchange offers for Coterra notes drew 97.78% participation on certain series and expire June 23. On the land legal side, the close moves the work from planning into execution. The land department is running JOA re-execution and title rationalization across the combined Delaware Basin position, and the federal acreage component requires federal title opinions before BLM drilling permits issue. Federal examination is a distinct workflow from standard Permian title — it cannot be batched with state or private leasehold on the same program. We handle federal title opinions and NMOCD regulatory work in Lea and Eddy Counties. Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law, licensed in Texas and New Mexico. If a call to scope the federal title queue or integration curative would be useful while the work is at its peak, I am available this week. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187

Subject + body combined

Subject: Devon/Coterra — merger closed June 9, combined guidance out, federal title queue now live Hi [First Name], The Devon-Coterra merger closed June 9 — pending a week ago, now done. Combined 2026 guidance issued at close puts production near 1.38 million Boe/d, including 500,000 barrels of oil per day, with $1.25 billion of debt retirement planned for the year and a target of $600 million in annual cost reductions by 2027. The private exchange offers for Coterra notes drew 97.78% participation on certain series and expire June 23. On the land legal side, the close moves the work from planning into execution. The land department is running JOA re-execution and title rationalization across the combined Delaware Basin position, and the federal acreage component requires federal title opinions before BLM drilling permits issue. Federal examination is a distinct workflow from standard Permian title — it cannot be batched with state or private leasehold on the same program. We handle federal title opinions and NMOCD regulatory work in Lea and Eddy Counties. Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law, licensed in Texas and New Mexico. If a call to scope the federal title queue or integration curative would be useful while the work is at its peak, I am available this week. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187

LinkedIn post (broader pattern — no operator name)

Devon Energy closed its merger with Coterra on June 9. A week earlier the deal was still pending; now it is done, and the work shifts from planning to execution. Combined 2026 guidance: approximately 1.38 million Boe/d, 500,000 barrels of oil per day, $600 million in targeted annual cost reductions by 2027, and $1.25 billion of debt retirement this year. The private note exchange drew 97.78% participation on certain series and expires June 23. Here is what a close like this means on the land side. JOA re-execution across the combined Delaware Basin position. Title rationalization where two acreage bases overlap. And on the federal component, a federal title opinion is required before BLM issues a drilling permit — a different examination workflow from state or private leasehold, and one that does not batch with it. The financial integration gets the headlines. The title queue is where the calendar actually gets tested.

▸Contacts (19) · click to show the list · emails pulled from clients-list.xlsx

Name	Email	Stage
Matt Beavers	No email address found	Cold
Andy Bennett	No email address found	Unknown
Keaton Curtis	Keaton.Curtis@coterra.com	Client
Kevin Gavigan	kevin.p.gavigan@gmail.com, Kevin.Gavigan@coterra.com	Cold
Michael Holiday	Michael.Holiday@coterra.com	Client
Martin Howell	No email address found	Cold
Adam Morgan	Adam.Morgan@coterra.com	Client
Blair Nutter	No email address found	Client
Dylan Park	dylan.park@coterra.com	Client
Colt Parks	No email address found	Cold
Megan Powell	No email address found	Client
Scott Richter	Scott.Richter@coterra.com	Client
Trey Roberson	Trey.Roberson@coterra.com	Client
Ashley St.Pierre	Ashley.StPierre@coterra.com	Client
Tristan Walker	Tristan.Walker@coterra.com	Client
Tristan Walker	No email address found	Cold
Brad Wechsler	Brad.Wechsler@coterra.com	Client
Russell Wickman	Russell.Wickman@coterra.com	Client
Aaron Young	No email address found	Unknown

Diamondback Energy · 19 Cold · 5 Warm · 1 Unknown · Permian · 25 contacts

8/10

Priced a June senior notes offering after April tender that retired ~$777M of 2051/2052 notes; Q1 2026 — 118 gross wells drilled, 147 gross wells completed in Midland Basin; base dividend and production guidance raisedDiamondback Energy SEC Form 8-K - senior notes pricing - June 2026 | Diamondback Energy Q1 2026 earnings release - increases base dividend and production guidance - May 2026 | Diamondback senior notes tender / term loan repayment - April 2026

Reason to reach out

Diamondback priced a June senior notes offering — more balance-sheet activity after the April tender that retired ~$777M of long-dated notes. Underneath the financing, Q1 ran hot: 147 gross wells completed in the Midland Basin in a single quarter. That drilled-to-completed flow is exactly where title on completion-ready locations becomes the constraint. Natural week to check in. (Source: Diamondback Form 8-K, June 2026; Q1 2026 earnings, May 2026)

Primary contact: Travis Stice

LinkedIn DM — send to Travis Stice

Travis — Diamondback priced another senior notes offering in June, following the April tender that retired about $777 million of the 2051 and 2052 notes and the term-loan repayment that left gross debt near $12.7 billion. The operational pace behind the financing is the part that drives title work: Q1 saw 118 gross wells drilled and 147 gross wells completed in the Midland Basin, with the base dividend and production guidance both raised. Completing wells at that rate means a steady flow of locations needing title confirmed before completion and revenue recognition. Across Midland and Delaware positions, that workflow tends to become the bottleneck. Worth a short conversation if legal bandwidth on the program is a question. — Ben Holliday, HELG · 210.469.3187

Email subject

Diamondback — June senior notes pricing, 147 gross wells completed in Q1, completion-ready title workflow

Email body (swap [First Name] when sending)

Hi [First Name], Diamondback priced a senior notes offering in June, per its latest 8-K — continuing an active run of balance-sheet work that included an April tender retiring about $777 million of the 2051 and 2052 notes, plus repayment of the remaining $550 million on the 2027 term loan, leaving gross debt near $12.7 billion. The operating pace underneath the financing is what drives the title work. Q1 2026 saw 118 gross wells drilled and 147 gross wells completed in the Midland Basin, with the base dividend and production guidance both raised. Completing wells at that rate means a continuous flow of locations moving from drilled to completed — and title on each has to be confirmed before completion proceeds and revenue is recognized. Across Midland and Delaware Basin positions at this pace, that completion-ready title and curative workflow tends to compress faster than the operational schedule. We handle title opinions and curative across the Permian Basin, licensed in Texas and New Mexico, Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law. If it would be useful to discuss the legal support structure given the current completion pace, I am available this week. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187

Subject + body combined

Subject: Diamondback — June senior notes pricing, 147 gross wells completed in Q1, completion-ready title workflow Hi [First Name], Diamondback priced a senior notes offering in June, per its latest 8-K — continuing an active run of balance-sheet work that included an April tender retiring about $777 million of the 2051 and 2052 notes, plus repayment of the remaining $550 million on the 2027 term loan, leaving gross debt near $12.7 billion. The operating pace underneath the financing is what drives the title work. Q1 2026 saw 118 gross wells drilled and 147 gross wells completed in the Midland Basin, with the base dividend and production guidance both raised. Completing wells at that rate means a continuous flow of locations moving from drilled to completed — and title on each has to be confirmed before completion proceeds and revenue is recognized. Across Midland and Delaware Basin positions at this pace, that completion-ready title and curative workflow tends to compress faster than the operational schedule. We handle title opinions and curative across the Permian Basin, licensed in Texas and New Mexico, Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law. If it would be useful to discuss the legal support structure given the current completion pace, I am available this week. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187

LinkedIn post (broader pattern — no operator name)

Diamondback Energy priced a senior notes offering in June, the latest in an active stretch of balance-sheet work — it follows an April tender that retired roughly $777 million of 2051 and 2052 notes and a term-loan repayment that left gross debt near $12.7 billion. The financing gets attention. The operating number worth watching is the completion count. In Q1, Diamondback drilled 118 gross wells and completed 147 gross wells in the Midland Basin, and raised both its base dividend and production guidance. When a program completes wells at that rate, each location has to have title confirmed before completion proceeds and revenue is recognized. That title and curative workflow on completion-ready locations runs continuously, and across both Midland and Delaware positions it tends to compress faster than the drilling schedule plans for.

▸Contacts (25) · click to show the list · emails pulled from clients-list.xlsx

Name	Email	Stage
Danielle Anderson	ldanderson@diamondbackenergy.com	Cold
Laura Barnett	lbarnett@diamondbackenergy.com	Cold
Jaydan Bird	Jbird@diamondbackenergy.com	Cold
Greg Boggs	gboggs@diamondbackenergy.com	Cold
Randis Butts	No email address found	Cold
Bill Caraway	No email address found	Unknown
Kevin Dickerson	kdickerson@diamondbackenergy.com	Cold
Neil Dufford	No email address found	Cold
Chas Gauthier	cgauth@gmail.com	Warm
Jennifer George	jgeorge@diamondbackenergy.com	Cold
Mandy Hendrix	mhendrix@diamondbackenergy.com	Cold
Jason Henson	jhenson@diamondbackenergy.com	Cold
Tyler Humphries	No email address found	Cold
Joseph Jarke	jjarke@diamondbackenergy.com	Warm
Ryan Kelly	No email address found	Cold
Matt Midkiff	mmidkiff@diamondbackenergy.com	Warm
Matthew Midkiff	No email address found	Cold
Katayoun Mohebkhosravi	kmoheb@diamondbackenergy.com	Cold
Drew Neagle	dneagle@diamondbackenergy.com	Cold
Michael Owen	No email address found	Cold
Kyle Pierce	kpierce@diamondbackenergy.com	Cold
Aaron Tanner	atanner@diamondbackenergy.com	Cold
Chase Van Winkle	cvanwinkle@diamondbackenergy.com	Warm
Andrew Waller	awaller@diamondbackenergy.com	Warm
Amanda Winkler	awinkler@diamondbackenergy.com	Cold

ConocoPhillips · 60 Client · 6 Unknown · Permian · 66 contacts

7/10

$2B Delaware sale still unconfirmed mid-June (no buyer named, deliberations early-stage); BLM May NM/TX federal lease sale and Eddy County lease reinstatement at 20% royalty reshape the federal title and leasing picture on COP's federal Delaware positionStocktwits / World Oil - ConocoPhillips $2B Permian sale still under review, no buyer named - mid-June 2026 | BLM - May 2026 New Mexico and Texas oil and gas lease sale | Environment+Energy Leader - BLM reinstates Eddy County NM Delaware lease at 20% royalty - 2026 | ConocoPhillips Form 10-Q Q1 2026 - SEC

Reason to reach out

COP's $2B Delaware sale is still unconfirmed mid-June — no buyer named. The fresher development is federal: BLM's May NM/TX lease sale and an Eddy County Delaware lease reinstated at 20% royalty. With 60%+ of Eddy County federally owned, COP's federal Delaware position carries a federal title workload that runs regardless of whether the package sells — and federal examination is its own workflow before BLM permits issue. (Source: BLM May 2026 lease sale; Eddy County reinstatement 2026)

Primary contact: Nick Olds

LinkedIn DM — send to Nick Olds

Nick — ConocoPhillips' exploration of a roughly $2 billion Delaware Basin sale is still unresolved as of mid-June, with no buyer named. The development worth flagging this period is on the federal side: the BLM held a New Mexico and Texas lease sale in May and reinstated an Eddy County Delaware lease at a 20% royalty rate. More than 60% of Eddy County is federally owned. For COP's federal Delaware position, that activity drives federal title examination — required before BLM drilling permits issue, and a separate workflow from state or private leasehold. Whether or not the package sells, COP keeps running the remaining position, and that federal title work runs with it. HELG handles federal title opinions in the Delaware Basin, licensed in Texas and New Mexico. Worth a short conversation. — Ben Holliday, HELG · 210.469.3187

Email subject

ConocoPhillips — $2B Delaware sale still unconfirmed; BLM May lease sale and Eddy County reinstatement reshape the federal title picture

Email body (swap [First Name] when sending)

Hi [First Name], ConocoPhillips' exploration of a roughly $2 billion Delaware Basin sale remains unresolved as of mid-June — no buyer named, deliberations still early-stage, and the company may decide not to sell. It is part of the $5 billion disposition target for year-end 2026. The fresher development is on the federal side of the same geography. The BLM held a New Mexico and Texas oil and gas lease sale in May and reinstated a terminated Eddy County Delaware lease at a 20% royalty rate, above the Inflation Reduction Act floor for onshore federal leases. More than 60% of the acreage in Eddy County is federally owned, and roughly 30% in Lea. For an operator with COP's federal Delaware position, that leasing and reinstatement activity drives federal title examination — required before BLM drilling permits issue, and a workflow distinct from state or private leasehold. Whether or not the $2B package sells, COP continues running the remaining Delaware position, and the federal title work runs with it. Q1 2026: 698 MBOED from the Delaware Basin alone. We handle Delaware Basin and federal title opinions and curative in Texas and New Mexico. Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law. If a conversation on the federal title workload would be useful, I am available this week. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187

Subject + body combined

Subject: ConocoPhillips — $2B Delaware sale still unconfirmed; BLM May lease sale and Eddy County reinstatement reshape the federal title picture Hi [First Name], ConocoPhillips' exploration of a roughly $2 billion Delaware Basin sale remains unresolved as of mid-June — no buyer named, deliberations still early-stage, and the company may decide not to sell. It is part of the $5 billion disposition target for year-end 2026. The fresher development is on the federal side of the same geography. The BLM held a New Mexico and Texas oil and gas lease sale in May and reinstated a terminated Eddy County Delaware lease at a 20% royalty rate, above the Inflation Reduction Act floor for onshore federal leases. More than 60% of the acreage in Eddy County is federally owned, and roughly 30% in Lea. For an operator with COP's federal Delaware position, that leasing and reinstatement activity drives federal title examination — required before BLM drilling permits issue, and a workflow distinct from state or private leasehold. Whether or not the $2B package sells, COP continues running the remaining Delaware position, and the federal title work runs with it. Q1 2026: 698 MBOED from the Delaware Basin alone. We handle Delaware Basin and federal title opinions and curative in Texas and New Mexico. Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law. If a conversation on the federal title workload would be useful, I am available this week. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187

LinkedIn post (broader pattern — no operator name)

ConocoPhillips' roughly $2 billion Delaware Basin sale is still unresolved as of mid-June — no buyer named, deliberations described as early-stage, and the company may keep the assets. Meanwhile, the federal leasing picture in the same geography moved. The BLM held a New Mexico and Texas lease sale in May and reinstated a terminated Eddy County Delaware lease at a 20% royalty rate, above the Inflation Reduction Act floor. More than 60% of Eddy County is federally owned. Here is the practical point for any operator with a large federal Delaware position. Federal leases require a federal title opinion before BLM issues a drilling permit, and that examination is a different workflow from state or private leasehold. Whether a package like COP's sells or not, the operator keeps developing what it holds, and the federal title work runs on its own track underneath the M&A headlines.

▸Contacts (66) · click to show the list · emails pulled from clients-list.xlsx

Name	Email	Stage
Marc Acuff	No email address found	Unknown
Adam Altenhofen	adam.altenhofen@conocophillips.com	Client
Stephanie Ashley	stephanie.ashley@conocophillips.com	Client
Brandon Beversdorf	brandon.beversdorf@conocophillips.com	Client
John Bowman	john.e.bowman@conocophillips.com	Client
Henry Calle	henry.calle@conocophillips.com	Client
Mark Carter	mark.carter2@conocophillips.com	Client
Wilson Cash	wilson.cash@conocophillips.com	Client
Jackie Chatterton	jackie.chatterton@conocophillips.com	Client
Matt Darby	matt.darby@conocophillips.com	Client
Brian Dart	brian.c.dart@cop.com	Client
Elisabeth Davis	elisabeth.f.davis@conocophillips.com	Client
Clint Devillier	clint.devillier@conocophillips.com	Client
Melissa Dimit	melissa.dimit@conocophillips.com	Client
Ben Eisterhold	No email address found	Unknown
Debbie Evans	debbie.evans@conocophillips.com	Client
Shaina Ferrell	shaina.j.ferrell@conocophillips.com	Client
Caroline Frederick	caroline.frederick@conocophillips.com	Client
Joseph Geiger	joseph.geiger@conocophillips.com	Client
Kelsey Gilbert	kelsey.gilbert@conocophillips.com	Client
Courtney Goggin	courtney.goggin@conocophillips.com	Client
Kayla Hale	kayla.hale@conocophillips.com	Client
Brian Hall	brian.hall@conocophillips.com	Client
Ashley Hansen	No email address found	Unknown
Eric Hernandez	No email address found	Client
Catie Hill	catie.hill@conocophillips.com	Client
Caroline Hoban	caroline.hoban@conocophillips.com	Client
Jared Hobbs	jared.hobbs@conocophillips.com	Client
Aaron Hunter	aaron.hunter@conocophillips.com	Client
Kevin Irwin	kevin.irwin@conocophillips.com	Client
Davis Johnson	davis.d.johnson@conocophillips.com	Client
Dean Joshua	Josh.Dean@conocophillips.com	Client
Brian Joya	brian.joya@conocophillips.com	Client
Andrew Kendall	Andrew.Kendall@conocophillips.com	Client
Jeff Kliewer	jeff.kliewer@conocophillips.com	Client
Shelley Klingler	No email address found	Unknown
Leah M. Lawdermilk	Leah.M.Lawdermilk@conocophillips.com	Client
Brian Levea	brian.levea@conocophillips.com	Client
Zach Marsh	zach.marsh@concophillips.com	Client
Scott Mcbee	No email address found	Client
Kim Mccarver	kim.r.mccarver@conocophillips.com	Client
Mason Mclenna	No email address found	Client
Kieran Mcmullen	kieran.mcmullen@conocophillips.com	Client
Sarah Midkiff	sarah.h.midkiff@conocophillips.com	Client
Sean Miller	sean.miller@conocophillips.com	Client
Joey Moppert	joey.moppert@conocophillips.com	Client
Becca Morris	becca.morris@conocophillips.com	Client
Jason Parker	jason.c.parker@conocophillips.com	Client
Beth Ryan	beth.ryan@conocophillips.com	Client
Brooks Sitka	brooks.sitka@conocophillips.com	Client
Leslie Rountree Smith	leslie.rountreesmith@conocophillips.com	Client
Benjamin Stecker	ben.stecker@conocophillips.com	Client
Mackayla Stone	mackayla.stone@conocophillips.com	Client
Jeffrey Stout	jeff.s.stout@conocophillips.com	Client
John Stretcher	jsstretcher@gmail.com	Client
Robert Stumpf	No email address found	Client
Maribel Torres	maribel.torres@conocophillips.com	Client
Chad Tshirhardt	No email address found	Unknown
Macie Valles	No email address found	Client
Joann Velasquez	joann.velasquez@conocophillips.com	Client
Chris Virant	No email address found	Client
Steve Virant	No email address found	Unknown
Johnna Williams	johnna.williams@conocophillips.com	Client
Justin Williams	justin.k.williams@cop.com	Client
Cash Wilson	No email address found	Client
Henry Zollinger	henry.zollinger@conocophillips.com	Client

EOG Resources · 1 Warm · 36 Client · Permian · 37 contacts

7/10

Utica now a foundational play post-Encino (1.1M net acres, ~2B Boe net resource); 2026 program — 3 rigs, 3 frac crews, 85 Utica wells; $6.5B capex, 13% production growth, ~300 Delaware + 115 Eagle Ford net wellsMarcellus Drilling News - EOG 2026 Utica program: 3 rigs, 3 frac crews, 85 wells - March 2026 | EOG Resources 2026 capital plan - Feb 24, 2026 | EOG Resources Form 8-K / SEC - 2026 | EOG Encino Energy Utica acquisition close - August 2025

Reason to reach out

EOG is running the Ohio Utica as a foundational play post-Encino — 3 rigs, 3 frac crews, 85 net wells in 2026 — while standing up Ohio title and JOA infrastructure from a lower base. At the same time the Delaware (300 net wells) and Eagle Ford (115 net wells) programs run at full scale. Multi-basin programs at this pace are where outside title and curative bandwidth in the established basins matters. (Source: Marcellus Drilling News, March 2026; EOG 2026 capital plan, Feb 24, 2026)

Primary contact: Billy Helms

LinkedIn DM — send to Billy Helms

Billy — EOG is running the Ohio Utica as a foundational play this year following the Encino acquisition, with three rigs, three frac crews, and 85 net Utica wells planned. Alongside that, the 2026 program targets roughly 300 net wells in the Delaware Basin and 115 in the Eagle Ford, on about $6.5 billion of capital and 13% production growth. The Utica build-out means EOG is standing up Ohio title and JOA infrastructure from a lower base while two mature programs run at full scale — and the title and curative workloads in each basin build in parallel, not in sequence. HELG handles title opinions, curative, and regulatory work in Texas and New Mexico. If additional bandwidth in the Delaware or Eagle Ford would help while the Ohio program builds, worth a short conversation. — Ben Holliday, HELG · 210.469.3187

Email subject

EOG Resources — Utica foundational play (3 rigs, 85 wells); Delaware 300 + Eagle Ford 115 net wells running concurrently

Email body (swap [First Name] when sending)

Hi [First Name], EOG is running the Ohio Utica as a foundational play in 2026 — three rigs, three frac crews, and 85 net wells planned — following the Encino acquisition that lifted it to 1.1 million net core Utica acres with roughly 2 billion Boe of net resource potential. The full 2026 program also targets approximately 300 net wells in the Delaware Basin and 115 in the Eagle Ford, on about $6.5 billion of capital and 13% total production growth. The practical legal point is concurrency. EOG is standing up Ohio operational infrastructure — title examination framework, JOA standards, regulatory familiarity — in a basin where it is still building, while running two mature programs at full scale. The title, JOA, and curative workloads in the Delaware and Eagle Ford do not pause while the Ohio build-out proceeds; they run in parallel. We handle title opinions, curative, and NMOCD regulatory work in Texas and New Mexico across EOG's Delaware Basin and Eagle Ford programs. If discussing legal support in either of those markets would be useful, I am available this week. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187

Subject + body combined

Subject: EOG Resources — Utica foundational play (3 rigs, 85 wells); Delaware 300 + Eagle Ford 115 net wells running concurrently Hi [First Name], EOG is running the Ohio Utica as a foundational play in 2026 — three rigs, three frac crews, and 85 net wells planned — following the Encino acquisition that lifted it to 1.1 million net core Utica acres with roughly 2 billion Boe of net resource potential. The full 2026 program also targets approximately 300 net wells in the Delaware Basin and 115 in the Eagle Ford, on about $6.5 billion of capital and 13% total production growth. The practical legal point is concurrency. EOG is standing up Ohio operational infrastructure — title examination framework, JOA standards, regulatory familiarity — in a basin where it is still building, while running two mature programs at full scale. The title, JOA, and curative workloads in the Delaware and Eagle Ford do not pause while the Ohio build-out proceeds; they run in parallel. We handle title opinions, curative, and NMOCD regulatory work in Texas and New Mexico across EOG's Delaware Basin and Eagle Ford programs. If discussing legal support in either of those markets would be useful, I am available this week. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187

LinkedIn post (broader pattern — no operator name)

EOG Resources is running its Ohio Utica as a foundational play in 2026 — three rigs, three frac crews, 85 net wells planned — the result of the Encino acquisition that took EOG to 1.1 million net core Utica acres. At the same time, the 2026 program targets roughly 300 net wells in the Delaware Basin and 115 in the Eagle Ford, on about $6.5 billion of capital and 13% production growth. Here is the part that shapes legal workload. A new operating area means building title examination framework, JOA standards, and regulatory familiarity that an established basin already has. EOG is doing that in Ohio while running two mature programs at full scale in the Delaware and Eagle Ford. When programs run across three basins simultaneously, the title and curative workload in each does not wait for the others. It all comes due at once.

▸Contacts (37) · click to show the list · emails pulled from clients-list.xlsx

Name	Email	Stage
Laurie Archer	laurie_Archer@eogresources.com	Client
Gary Barker	gary_barker@eogresources.com	Client
James Barwiss	James_Barwis@eogresources.com	Client
Taylor Bellows	taylor_bellows@eogresources.com	Client
Vivian Beltran	vivian_beltran@eogresources.com	Client
Dustin Bynum	dustin_bynum@eogresources.com	Client
Elizabeth Castillo	elizabeth_castillo@eogresources.com	Client
Tatum Dolan	tatum_dolan@eogresources.com	Client
Riker Everett	riker_everett@eogresources.com	Client
Austin Frye	No email address found	Client
Pat Gray	pgray@bpgray.com	Warm
Clay Haggard	clay_haggard@eogresources.com	Client
Skyler Henderson	skyler_henderson@eogresources.com	Client
Stephen Himes	steve_himes@eogresources.com	Client
Katie Jirasek	Katie_Jirasek@eogresources.com	Client
Jamin Jones	No email address found	Client
Taylor Jordan	tracy_jordan@eogresources.com	Client
Judy Kirian	judy_kirian@eogresources.com	Client
Erin Lloyd	erin_lloyd@eogresources.com	Client
Katie Mcbryde	Katie_McBryde@eogresources.com	Client
Casey Ott	No email address found	Client
Josh Pitman	josh_pitman@eogresources.com	Client
Chloe Sawtelle	chloe_sawtelle@eogresources.com	Client
Dax Shepherd	No email address found	Client
Bella Sikes	bella_sikes@eogresources.com	Client
Drew Simmons	drew_simmons@eogresources.com	Client
Evan Simmons	No email address found	Client
Matt Smith	matthew_smith@eogresources.com	Client
Graham Steele	No email address found	Client
Nathan Stephenson	No email address found	Client
Richard Stewart	richard_stewart@eogresources.com	Client
Cassie Stonedale	cassie_stonedale@eogresources.com	Client
Laci Stretcher	laci_stretcher@eogresources.com	Client
Ellarie Sutton	ellarie_sutton@eogresources.com	Client
Damon Weger	damon_weger@eogresources.com	Client
Michael Yemm	Michael_Yemm@eogresources.com	Client
Sherman Young	sherman_young@eogresources.com	Client

Crescent Energy · 4 Cold · Permian · 4 contacts

7/10

Q2 2026 earnings approaching — first full read since CEO Rockecharlie cited 'significant progress' on Permian integration; $355M Eagle Ford minerals deals closed Q1; 2026 guidance 320-335 MBoe/d, 6-7 rig program, ~400K Boe/d combinedCrescent Energy Form 8-K Q1 2026 earnings - SEC (CEO Rockecharlie integration commentary) | Investing.com - Crescent Energy Q2 2026 earnings preview | Crescent Energy - two Eagle Ford minerals acquisitions ~$355M, closed Q1 - Feb 25, 2026 | Crescent-Vital merger close - December 15, 2025

Reason to reach out

Q2 earnings approaching — the first full read since Rockecharlie cited 'significant progress' on the Vital Permian integration. Two Eagle Ford minerals deals (~$355M) closed in Q1 add title and division-order work on top of the JOA and title rationalization across the absorbed Vital acreage. None of that runs on rig count — it runs on the land department's capacity to process what the deals added. (Source: Crescent Q1 2026 8-K; Eagle Ford minerals acquisitions Feb 25, 2026)

Primary contact: David Rockecharlie

LinkedIn DM — send to David Rockecharlie

David — Crescent's Q2 earnings are coming up, the first full read since the Q1 call where the team cited significant progress integrating the Vital Permian assets. Two Eagle Ford minerals acquisitions totaling about $355 million also closed in Q1. Here is the legal workload that runs through a stretch like this: JOA and title rationalization on the newly absorbed Vital acreage, plus the title and division-order work that minerals deals generate. Neither is tied to rig count — both run on the land department's capacity to process what the acquisitions added to the combined base. We handle Eagle Ford and Permian title and curative, licensed in Texas, Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law. If a conversation on the legal support structure ahead of or after Q2 would be useful, easy to reach. — Ben Holliday, HELG · 210.469.3187

Email subject

Crescent Energy — Q2 earnings approaching, Vital integration ongoing, $355M Eagle Ford minerals title and DO work

Email body (swap [First Name] when sending)

Hi [First Name], Crescent's Q2 2026 earnings are approaching — the first full-quarter read on the Vital integration since the Q1 call, where the team cited significant progress integrating the acquired Permian assets. Two Eagle Ford minerals acquisitions totaling approximately $355 million also closed in Q1. The legal workload that runs through a transition like this is steady regardless of activity level. On the operated side, JOA and title rationalization on the newly absorbed Vital acreage. On the minerals side, the title and division-order work that the $355 million in Eagle Ford acquisitions generates. Neither is tied to rig count — both run on the land department's capacity to process what the deals added to the combined base. 2026 guidance is 320-335 MBoe/d on a 6-7 rig program; the combined company produces nearly 400,000 Boe/d. We handle Eagle Ford and Permian title opinions, curative, and division-order work, licensed in Texas, Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law. If a conversation on the legal support structure for the integrated position would be useful around Q2 earnings, I am available this week. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187

Subject + body combined

Subject: Crescent Energy — Q2 earnings approaching, Vital integration ongoing, $355M Eagle Ford minerals title and DO work Hi [First Name], Crescent's Q2 2026 earnings are approaching — the first full-quarter read on the Vital integration since the Q1 call, where the team cited significant progress integrating the acquired Permian assets. Two Eagle Ford minerals acquisitions totaling approximately $355 million also closed in Q1. The legal workload that runs through a transition like this is steady regardless of activity level. On the operated side, JOA and title rationalization on the newly absorbed Vital acreage. On the minerals side, the title and division-order work that the $355 million in Eagle Ford acquisitions generates. Neither is tied to rig count — both run on the land department's capacity to process what the deals added to the combined base. 2026 guidance is 320-335 MBoe/d on a 6-7 rig program; the combined company produces nearly 400,000 Boe/d. We handle Eagle Ford and Permian title opinions, curative, and division-order work, licensed in Texas, Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law. If a conversation on the legal support structure for the integrated position would be useful around Q2 earnings, I am available this week. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187

LinkedIn post (broader pattern — no operator name)

Crescent Energy heads into Q2 earnings as the first full-quarter read on its Vital Energy integration — on the Q1 call, the company cited significant progress integrating the acquired Permian assets, and Q2 will show whether the pace held. Two Eagle Ford minerals acquisitions totaling roughly $355 million also closed in Q1. Here is what runs underneath the earnings narrative on the land side. JOA and title rationalization on the newly absorbed Vital acreage. Title and division-order work generated by the minerals deals. Neither of those workstreams is tied to rig count or activity level — they run on the land department's capacity to process what the transactions added to the combined acreage base. Crescent is running the Permian at a lower activity level than Vital did, but the legal work required to rationalize that acreage into Crescent's standard runs on its own timeline.

▸Contacts (4) · click to show the list · emails pulled from clients-list.xlsx

Name	Email	Stage
David Hansen	No email address found	Cold
Glen Hodge	No email address found	Cold
Robert Matusek	No email address found	Cold
Zach Morgan	No email address found	Cold

Permian Resources · 1 Cold · 17 Client · Permian · 18 contacts

6/10

Annual meeting held off the April DEF 14A proxy; ~450,000 net acres in West Texas and SE New Mexico as second-largest Permian pure-play; bolt-on ground game continues as the standing title workload between named transactionsPermian Resources Corp Form DEF 14A - SEC, filed April 2026 (annual meeting) | Permian Resources Corp Form 10-Q Q1 2026 - SEC | Permian Resources company profile - ~450,000 net acres, second-largest Permian pure-play

Reason to reach out

No headline deal this period for Permian Resources — and that is the point. As the second-largest Permian pure-play (~450K net acres) and one of the Delaware's most active bolt-on acquirers, the ground game runs continuously between named transactions. Each small acquisition generates a title examination before drilling. The standing title and JOA workload is the legal need that sits underneath the larger deals. (Source: PR DEF 14A April 2026; Q1 2026 10-Q)

Primary contact: Will Hickey

LinkedIn DM — send to Will Hickey

Will — no headline acquisition for Permian Resources this period, which is itself the point worth making. As the second-largest Permian pure-play at roughly 450,000 net acres and one of the Delaware's most active bolt-on acquirers, the ground game runs continuously between named deals. Each small package in Reeves, Culberson, Lea, and Eddy Counties generates a title examination before a drilling permit can be filed, plus curative on what it surfaces. That standing workload does not pause between quarters, and it sits underneath the larger transactions when they come. We handle Delaware Basin title opinions and curative in all four counties, licensed in Texas and New Mexico, Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law. If outside bandwidth on the ground-game title workflow would help, worth a short conversation. — Ben Holliday, HELG · 210.469.3187

Email subject

Permian Resources — ground game title workload between named deals; second-largest Permian pure-play at ~450K net acres

Email body (swap [First Name] when sending)

Hi [First Name], Permian Resources held its 2026 annual meeting off the April proxy, with no change to the operating posture and no headline acquisition announced this period. For one of the Delaware Basin's most active bolt-on acquirers, that quiet stretch is the part worth flagging. As the second-largest Permian pure-play at roughly 450,000 net acres in West Texas and southeast New Mexico, Permian Resources runs a ground game that adds small acreage packages on a rolling basis in Reeves, Culberson, Lea, and Eddy Counties. Each package generates a title examination requirement before a drilling permit can be filed, plus curative on what the examination surfaces. That title and JOA workload runs continuously between named transactions — it does not pause between quarters, and it sits underneath the larger deals when they come. We handle Delaware Basin title opinions and curative in all four of those counties. Licensed in Texas and New Mexico, Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law. If discussing the legal support structure for the ground-game acquisition workflow would be useful, I am available this week. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187

Subject + body combined

Subject: Permian Resources — ground game title workload between named deals; second-largest Permian pure-play at ~450K net acres Hi [First Name], Permian Resources held its 2026 annual meeting off the April proxy, with no change to the operating posture and no headline acquisition announced this period. For one of the Delaware Basin's most active bolt-on acquirers, that quiet stretch is the part worth flagging. As the second-largest Permian pure-play at roughly 450,000 net acres in West Texas and southeast New Mexico, Permian Resources runs a ground game that adds small acreage packages on a rolling basis in Reeves, Culberson, Lea, and Eddy Counties. Each package generates a title examination requirement before a drilling permit can be filed, plus curative on what the examination surfaces. That title and JOA workload runs continuously between named transactions — it does not pause between quarters, and it sits underneath the larger deals when they come. We handle Delaware Basin title opinions and curative in all four of those counties. Licensed in Texas and New Mexico, Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law. If discussing the legal support structure for the ground-game acquisition workflow would be useful, I am available this week. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187

LinkedIn post (broader pattern — no operator name)

Permian Resources held its annual meeting this spring and announced no headline acquisition this period. For one of the Delaware Basin's most active bolt-on acquirers, the quiet stretch between named deals is the part worth understanding. As the second-largest Permian pure-play at roughly 450,000 net acres, Permian Resources runs a ground game that adds small acreage packages on a rolling basis in Reeves, Culberson, Lea, and Eddy Counties. Each one generates a title examination requirement before a drilling permit can be filed, and curative on what the examination surfaces. That workload does not show up in a press release. It runs continuously underneath the larger transactions, and it does not pause between quarters. The question for any operator running a ground game at this scale is whether the legal workflow is built to keep pace with the acquisition activity rather than catch up to it.

▸Contacts (18) · click to show the list · emails pulled from clients-list.xlsx

Name	Email	Stage
Oliver Cho	Oliver.Cho@permianres.com	Client
Hayden Clyce	Hayden.Clyce@permianres.com	Client
Logan Cooksey	No email address found	Client
Ryan Curry	ryan@vfpetroleum.com	Client
Patrick Godwin	No email address found	Cold
Matthew Gray	Matthew.Gray@permianres.com	Client
Mark Hajdik	mark.hajdik@permianres.com	Client
Kelsi Henriques	Kelsi.Henriques@permianres.com	Client
Jon-aaron House	jon-aaron.house@conocophillips.com	Client
Michael Hurlbut	michael.hurlbut@permianres.com	Client
Trevor Irby	trevor.irby@permianres.com	Client
Sean Johnson	Sean.Johnson@permianres.com	Client
Matt Jordan	matt.jordan@permianres.com	Client
Daniel Koury	Daniel.Koury@permianres.com	Client
Brian Pond	Brian.Pond@permainres.com	Client
Adam Reker	No email address found	Client
Drew Tarwater	No email address found	Client
Alexa Wolf	alexa.wolf@permianres.com	Client

Mewbourne Oil · 3 Cold · 1 Warm · Permian · 4 contacts

6/10

New Mexico regulatory and political environment in focus — 2026 governor race and federal leasing pressure on Eddy/Lea (60%+ federal in Eddy); private top-tier Delaware driller with continuous NMOCD and federal title workloadIJR / Daily Caller (David Blackmon) - New Mexico governor race and oil and gas policy - June 7, 2026 | nm.news - NMOGA's Missi Currier on the 2026 governor race - May 27, 2026 | Environment+Energy Leader - BLM reinstates Eddy County NM Delaware lease at 20% royalty - 2026 | BLM - May 2026 New Mexico and Texas lease sale

Reason to reach out

Mewbourne runs roughly 75% of its program in Eddy/Lea NM and Loving/Reeves TX — and the New Mexico regulatory environment is the live story this period: a 2026 governor race centered on oil and gas, plus active BLM federal leasing (Eddy County lease reinstated at 20% royalty, 60%+ of the county federally owned). At that NM concentration, NMOCD regulatory and federal title work is continuous. First-touch on program scale and the NM environment is appropriate. (Source: Blackmon op-ed June 7, 2026; NMOGA May 27, 2026; BLM Eddy County reinstatement 2026)

Primary contact: Mike Mewbourne

LinkedIn DM — send to Mike Mewbourne

Mike — Mewbourne concentrates roughly 75% of its drilling in Eddy and Lea Counties, New Mexico, and Loving and Reeves Counties, Texas, and the New Mexico regulatory environment is the live story right now. The 2026 governor race has put oil and gas policy front and center, and on the federal side the BLM held a New Mexico and Texas lease sale in May and reinstated an Eddy County Delaware lease at a 20% royalty rate — with more than 60% of Eddy County federally owned. At Mewbourne's New Mexico concentration, NMOCD work — compulsory pooling, allocation well filings — and federal and state title opinions are a continuous requirement. HELG handles that workload, licensed in Texas and New Mexico, Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law, with direct NMOCD compulsory pooling and allocation well experience. If a conversation on supporting a program at this scale in New Mexico would be useful, I am easy to reach. — Ben Holliday, HELG · 210.469.3187

Email subject

Mewbourne — New Mexico regulatory environment in focus; continuous NMOCD and federal title workload in Eddy/Lea

Email body (swap [First Name] when sending)

Hi [First Name], Mewbourne concentrates roughly 75% of its drilling in Eddy and Lea Counties, New Mexico, and Loving and Reeves Counties, Texas — and the New Mexico regulatory environment is the live story this period. The 2026 governor race has put oil and gas policy front and center, in a state where the Delaware Basin funds more than 40% of the budget. On the federal side, more than 60% of Eddy County and roughly 30% of Lea County is federally owned; the BLM held a New Mexico and Texas lease sale in May and reinstated an Eddy County Delaware lease at a 20% royalty rate. At that New Mexico concentration, title opinions on new permits, NMOCD regulatory filings — compulsory pooling, allocation well applications — and federal title work are a continuous requirement, not a quarterly batch. An uncertain regulatory trajectory raises the cost of getting the filings wrong. HELG handles title opinions, NMOCD regulatory work, and federal and state curative in Lea and Eddy Counties, New Mexico, and Loving and Reeves Counties, Texas. Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law, licensed in Texas and New Mexico, with direct NMOCD compulsory pooling and allocation well experience. If it would be useful to discuss how we support operators running Delaware Basin programs at this scale in New Mexico, I would be glad to connect. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187

Subject + body combined

Subject: Mewbourne — New Mexico regulatory environment in focus; continuous NMOCD and federal title workload in Eddy/Lea Hi [First Name], Mewbourne concentrates roughly 75% of its drilling in Eddy and Lea Counties, New Mexico, and Loving and Reeves Counties, Texas — and the New Mexico regulatory environment is the live story this period. The 2026 governor race has put oil and gas policy front and center, in a state where the Delaware Basin funds more than 40% of the budget. On the federal side, more than 60% of Eddy County and roughly 30% of Lea County is federally owned; the BLM held a New Mexico and Texas lease sale in May and reinstated an Eddy County Delaware lease at a 20% royalty rate. At that New Mexico concentration, title opinions on new permits, NMOCD regulatory filings — compulsory pooling, allocation well applications — and federal title work are a continuous requirement, not a quarterly batch. An uncertain regulatory trajectory raises the cost of getting the filings wrong. HELG handles title opinions, NMOCD regulatory work, and federal and state curative in Lea and Eddy Counties, New Mexico, and Loving and Reeves Counties, Texas. Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law, licensed in Texas and New Mexico, with direct NMOCD compulsory pooling and allocation well experience. If it would be useful to discuss how we support operators running Delaware Basin programs at this scale in New Mexico, I would be glad to connect. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187

LinkedIn post (broader pattern — no operator name)

Mewbourne Oil is one of the most active drillers in the Delaware Basin — private, more than 2,500 wells, no investor relations function — which means the operating environment is the signal, not a press release. Right now, that environment is the story. The 2026 New Mexico governor race has put oil and gas policy at the center of the campaign, in a state where the Delaware Basin funds more than 40% of the budget. On the federal side, more than 60% of Eddy County is federally owned, the BLM held a New Mexico and Texas lease sale in May, and a terminated Eddy County Delaware lease was reinstated at a 20% royalty rate. For an operator running roughly 75% of its program in Eddy and Lea Counties, this is the backdrop against which the NMOCD regulatory work — compulsory pooling, allocation well applications — and the federal and state title work get done. None of it batches quarterly. It runs continuously, and the regulatory trajectory only raises the stakes on getting the filings right.

▸Contacts (4) · click to show the list · emails pulled from clients-list.xlsx

Name	Email	Stage
Josh Anderson	janderson@mewbourne.com	Warm
Brad Dunn	bdunn@mewbourne.com	Cold
Corey Mitchell	cmitchell@mewbourne.com	Cold
Ariana Rodrigues	arodrigues@mewbourne.com	Cold

Riley Permian · 2 Warm · 2 Unknown · OKC · 4 contacts

6/10

Silverback Yeso Trend acreage (Eddy County NM, +50% undeveloped inventory, 300+ gross locations) in active development; Q1 2026 production 35,600 Boe/d, sales +11%; NM federal leasing environment relevant to the Northwest Shelf programRiley Exploration Permian Form 10-Q Q1 2026 - SEC | StockTitan - REPX Q1 2026 net loss on hedge losses, production 35,600 Boe/d | Riley Permian - Silverback acquisition close (~$123M, Eddy County Yeso trend) - July 1, 2025 | BLM - May 2026 New Mexico lease sale and Eddy County reinstatement

Reason to reach out

Riley's Silverback acreage (Eddy County Yeso trend, +50% inventory, 300+ gross locations) is moving into active development, and Q1 production grew to 35,600 Boe/d. The Yeso Trend and Northwest Shelf have distinct NMOCD and title requirements from the Delaware Basin — and the broader NM federal leasing environment this period sits over the same acreage. HELG's New Mexico experience applies directly to the Northwest Shelf. (Source: Riley Q1 2026 10-Q; Silverback close July 1, 2025; BLM May 2026 NM lease activity)

Primary contact: Bobby Riley

LinkedIn DM — send to Bobby Riley

Bobby — Riley's Silverback acreage in the Yeso trend of Eddy County is moving into active development — the acquisition added more than 300 gross locations and expanded undeveloped inventory by nearly 50%, and Q1 production grew to 35,600 Boe/d. The Yeso Trend and Northwest Shelf have their own NMOCD filing requirements and a title examination workflow distinct from the Delaware Basin to the south — different formation history, different curative patterns. The broader New Mexico leasing environment this period — the BLM's May lease sale and an Eddy County reinstatement at 20% royalty — sits over that same acreage. HELG handles NMOCD regulatory work and title opinions across New Mexico, including the Northwest Shelf, licensed in Texas and New Mexico. If a conversation on the legal support structure for the New Mexico program would be useful, I am easy to reach. — Ben Holliday, HELG · 210.469.3187

Email subject

Riley Permian — Silverback Yeso Trend in active development; Northwest Shelf NM title and regulatory workload distinct from the Delaware

Email body (swap [First Name] when sending)

Hi [First Name], Riley's Silverback acreage in the Yeso trend of Eddy County, New Mexico — acquired in July 2025 for approximately $123 million — is moving into active development. The deal added more than 300 gross undeveloped locations and expanded inventory by nearly 50%, and Q1 2026 production grew to 35,600 Boe/d with oil and gas sales up 11% to $113.9 million (the reported net loss was driven by $127 million in derivative losses, not operations). The development point is geographic. Riley's acreage sits in the Yeso Trend and Northwest Shelf of New Mexico and Yoakum County, Texas — distinct from the Delaware Basin to the south. The Yeso Trend has its own NMOCD filing requirements, formation history, and title examination workflow. As the Silverback locations move into development, that New Mexico title and regulatory workload builds with them — and the broader New Mexico leasing environment this period, including the BLM's May lease sale and an Eddy County reinstatement at a 20% royalty rate, sits over the same acreage. HELG handles NMOCD regulatory filings, compulsory pooling, and title opinions across New Mexico, including the Northwest Shelf — not just the Delaware. Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law, licensed in Texas and New Mexico. If a conversation on the legal support structure for the New Mexico program as the Silverback acreage develops would be useful, I am available this week. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187

Subject + body combined

Subject: Riley Permian — Silverback Yeso Trend in active development; Northwest Shelf NM title and regulatory workload distinct from the Delaware Hi [First Name], Riley's Silverback acreage in the Yeso trend of Eddy County, New Mexico — acquired in July 2025 for approximately $123 million — is moving into active development. The deal added more than 300 gross undeveloped locations and expanded inventory by nearly 50%, and Q1 2026 production grew to 35,600 Boe/d with oil and gas sales up 11% to $113.9 million (the reported net loss was driven by $127 million in derivative losses, not operations). The development point is geographic. Riley's acreage sits in the Yeso Trend and Northwest Shelf of New Mexico and Yoakum County, Texas — distinct from the Delaware Basin to the south. The Yeso Trend has its own NMOCD filing requirements, formation history, and title examination workflow. As the Silverback locations move into development, that New Mexico title and regulatory workload builds with them — and the broader New Mexico leasing environment this period, including the BLM's May lease sale and an Eddy County reinstatement at a 20% royalty rate, sits over the same acreage. HELG handles NMOCD regulatory filings, compulsory pooling, and title opinions across New Mexico, including the Northwest Shelf — not just the Delaware. Board Certified in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law, licensed in Texas and New Mexico. If a conversation on the legal support structure for the New Mexico program as the Silverback acreage develops would be useful, I am available this week. Ben Holliday Holliday Energy Law Group 210.469.3187

LinkedIn post (broader pattern — no operator name)

Riley Exploration Permian is developing the Silverback acreage it acquired in the Yeso trend of Eddy County, New Mexico — a roughly $123 million deal that expanded undeveloped inventory by nearly 50% and added more than 300 gross drilling locations adjacent to its existing position. Q1 2026 production grew to 35,600 Boe/d. Here is the geographic point that shapes the legal work. The Yeso Trend and Northwest Shelf are not the Delaware Basin. The NMOCD filing requirements, formation history, and title examination workflow in that part of New Mexico differ materially from the Delaware plays that dominate most Permian legal conversations. As the Silverback locations move into active development, the New Mexico title and regulatory workload builds with them — and the broader New Mexico leasing and regulatory environment this period, from the BLM's May lease sale to the 2026 governor race, sits over the same ground. New Mexico experience on the Northwest Shelf is a different thing from Delaware Basin experience.

▸Contacts (4) · click to show the list · emails pulled from clients-list.xlsx

Name	Email	Stage
Ty Edelen	No email address found	Unknown
Chris Harwi	No email address found	Unknown
Michael Palmer	michaelpalmer@rileypermian.com	Warm
Mark Smith	marksmith@rileypermian.com	Warm

Priority Outreach — sorted by signal score

Past Weekly Runs